On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence – comment on “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” by Säumel et al. (2023)

Abstract. In this article, we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” (Säumel et al., 2023). We have identified several design and methodological problems in the aforementioned article that may induce potential misinterpretations. First, our concerns are related to aspects of the study design and methodology that, in our opinion, introduce biases and critical errors. Second, we are concerned about the possible interpretations of the study with respect to the design of policies and the development of non-tariff barriers for South American countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOIL
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-193-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence – comment on “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” by Säumel et al. (2023)

Gonzalo Camba Sans, Cecilia Ríos, Andrés Quincke, Felipe Lezama et al.
1 citations
SOIL
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

On the risks of good intentions and poor evidence – comment on “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” by Säumel et al. (2023)

Gonzalo Camba Sans, Cecilia Ríos, Andrés Quincke, Felipe Lezama, Bruno Bazzoni, Agustín Núñez, Walter Baethgen, Santiago Baeza, Anaclara Guido, Gervasio Piñeiro, Fabiana Pezzani, Luis López‐Mársico, Andrea Tommasino, Pablo Baldassini, Luciana Staiano, José M. Paruelo, Federico Gallego
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. In this article, we make comments on some methodological issues and on the general approach of the paper “Back to the future? Conservative grassland management can preserve soil health in the changing landscapes of Uruguay” (Säumel et al., 2023). We have identified several design and methodological problems in the aforementioned article that may induce potential misinterpretations. First, our concerns are related to aspects of the study design and methodology that, in our opinion, introduce biases and critical errors. Second, we are concerned about the possible interpretations of the study with respect to the design of policies and the development of non-tariff barriers for South American countries.

SOILVol. 11(1)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Agricultural Plant Physiology and Ecology Research Institute (AR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (UY), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.