Storage Quality Improvement of Duck Breast Meat: Role of Ultrasound-Assisted Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water
This study evaluated the effects of ultrasound-assisted slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) treatment on duck breast meat storage quality. The impact of different treatments-ultrasound combined with SAEW, SAEW alone, ultrasound combined with water, and water-alone treatment-on the freshness, texture, protein oxidation, and microbiological diversity of the meat was assessed under vacuum packaging at 4 °C. The results demonstrated that the ultrasound-SAEW combination significantly slowed pH decline, inhibited total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) formation, and preserved the redness (<i>a</i>*) and texture of duck breast meat. Additionally, carbonyl and total sulfhydryl measurements indicated that the combined treatment delayed protein oxidation. 16S rDNA analysis showed that combined treatment reduced the microbial abundance, particularly <i>Pseudomonas</i> and <i>Candida</i>. After 9 days of storage, the total viable count (TVC) of the treated duck breast meat remained within the GB 16869-2005 microbial contamination threshold for fresh meat (5.56 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g). These findings highlight the effectiveness of ultrasound-assisted SAEW in extending the shelf life and maintaining the quality of duck breast meat.
Authors
- Siyi Zhang
- Ziwu Gao
- Ruiyun Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-4561)
- Hengpeng Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-0330)
- Sumin Gao
- Xiangren Meng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1255-1216)
- Chuanming Huan
- Zhenyu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-1028)
- Anqi Xu
Institutions
- Institute of Food Science and Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN)
- Yangzhou University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Foods
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030534
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.58