Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyse a conflict between a group of Barcelona residents and the then mayor, Ada Colau, concerning the transformation of an area of the city into a green zone, which would involve the loss of public parking spaces. For data-gathering and analysis we have used ethnographic research and Critical Discourse Analysis. Our analysis reveals that the majority of citizens involved, by means of the different resources (ontological metaphors and various types of arguments), activate different frames with the aim of disputing the mayor’s standpoint. Our interpretation demonstrates that, from a position of climate change denial, these citizens do not explicitly deny scientific evidence, but do oppose radical changes to their own neighbourhood and lifestyle. Finally, we conclude with a brief reflection on the methodology used and on the need for a greater interconnection between discourse analysis and other social disciplines related to this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics and Society
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.24032.mor
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility

Esperanza Morales-López, A. C. Floyd
Pragmatics and Society
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
article

Citizens’ polarised discourses on climate change and mobility

Esperanza Morales-López, A. C. Floyd
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyse a conflict between a group of Barcelona residents and the then mayor, Ada Colau, concerning the transformation of an area of the city into a green zone, which would involve the loss of public parking spaces. For data-gathering and analysis we have used ethnographic research and Critical Discourse Analysis. Our analysis reveals that the majority of citizens involved, by means of the different resources (ontological metaphors and various types of arguments), activate different frames with the aim of disputing the mayor’s standpoint. Our interpretation demonstrates that, from a position of climate change denial, these citizens do not explicitly deny scientific evidence, but do oppose radical changes to their own neighbourhood and lifestyle. Finally, we conclude with a brief reflection on the methodology used and on the need for a greater interconnection between discourse analysis and other social disciplines related to this topic.

Pragmatics and Society
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.