Orthographic uncertainty

Abstract Measures of orthographic typicality have long been studied as predictors of lexical access. The best-known orthographic typicality measure is orthographic neighbourhood size ( Coltheart’s N or ON ), the number of words that are one letter different, by substitution, from the target word. A more recent related measure of orthographic typicality is orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 ( OLD20 ), the average Levenshtein orthographic edit distance of a target word from its 20 closest neighbours ( Yarkoni, Balota, and Yap, 2008 ). Both measures have been implicated in lexical access. In this paper, we propose and assess a family of measures of word form similarity we call orthographic uncertainty . These measures are based on Shannon entropy ( Shannon, 1948 ), which has a long history of being considered psychologically relevant. Orthographic uncertainty measures are superior to ON and OLD20 at predicting lexical decision and naming reaction times and accuracies. They are also superior to the older measures insofar as they are naturally tied to the widely-accepted quantification using Shannon Entropy of the psychological functions of familiarity, uncertainty, learnability, and representational and computational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Mental Lexicon
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24006.wes
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthographic uncertainty

Michelle Yang, Chris Westbury
2 citations
The Mental Lexicon
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
0.69
article

Orthographic uncertainty

Michelle Yang, Chris Westbury
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Measures of orthographic typicality have long been studied as predictors of lexical access. The best-known orthographic typicality measure is orthographic neighbourhood size ( Coltheart’s N or ON ), the number of words that are one letter different, by substitution, from the target word. A more recent related measure of orthographic typicality is orthographic Levenshtein distance 20 ( OLD20 ), the average Levenshtein orthographic edit distance of a target word from its 20 closest neighbours ( Yarkoni, Balota, and Yap, 2008 ). Both measures have been implicated in lexical access. In this paper, we propose and assess a family of measures of word form similarity we call orthographic uncertainty . These measures are based on Shannon entropy ( Shannon, 1948 ), which has a long history of being considered psychologically relevant. Orthographic uncertainty measures are superior to ON and OLD20 at predicting lexical decision and naming reaction times and accuracies. They are also superior to the older measures insofar as they are naturally tied to the widely-accepted quantification using Shannon Entropy of the psychological functions of familiarity, uncertainty, learnability, and representational and computational efficiency.

The Mental LexiconVol. 19(3)
University of Alberta (CA), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), McGill University (CA), Ocean University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Orthographic uncertainty — Michelle Yang, Chris Westbury · The Mental Lexicon (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS