Who are MaaS avoiders, wanderers or enthusiasts and what drives their intentions to adopt MaaS?

This study integrates the Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use (UTAUT) and Status Quo Bias (SQB) theories and draws on survey data covering nine dimensions: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, individual innovation, transition costs, sunk costs, inertia and resistance to use. The aim is to explore the underlying reasons and disparities that influence people's adoption of MaaS from both a facilitator and inhibitor perspective. To mitigate the confounding effect of group heterogeneity on the MaaS acceptance mechanism, the latent class clustering method was employed to naturally categorize respondents into three distinct groups: MaaS avoiders, wanderers and enthusiasts. A structural equation model was then developed to delineate the path of influence of users' intention to use and to contrast the differences in path coefficients between the different groups. The results show that individuals who are most dependent on public transport are not necessarily the most willing to use MaaS, while those who have used car-sharing services are more likely to adopt MaaS. It also highlights that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to promoting MaaS adoption, as different groups of people have different preferences, needs and concerns about the service. MaaS avoiders are predominantly middle-aged and older individuals with lower incomes, whose reluctance to switch stems from the associated transition costs, which create inertia. To encourage this group to adopt MaaS, operators should develop a gradual and user-friendly transition plan that minimizes complexity and addresses potential challenges such as unfamiliarity with the system and resistance to service changes. Conversely, MaaS wanderers’ willingness to engage with the service is strongly influenced by social influence and performance expectancy. Operators can increase their social media presence and raise awareness of the practicality of MaaS, helping to build an early customer base. In addition, the innovative mindset of MaaS enthusiasts plays a key role in their willingness to adopt the service, although operators must also be vigilant about privacy concerns and the risk of data breaches. Overall, this study enriches our understanding of the factors that shape MaaS adoption and provides actionable insights for improving services across different market segments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Economics and Management
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.team.2025.02.001
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who are MaaS avoiders, wanderers or enthusiasts and what drives their intentions to adopt MaaS?

Wentao Li, Zuoxian Gan
6 citations
Transport Economics and Management
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
4.10
article

Who are MaaS avoiders, wanderers or enthusiasts and what drives their intentions to adopt MaaS?

Wentao Li, Zuoxian Gan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study integrates the Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use (UTAUT) and Status Quo Bias (SQB) theories and draws on survey data covering nine dimensions: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, individual innovation, transition costs, sunk costs, inertia and resistance to use. The aim is to explore the underlying reasons and disparities that influence people's adoption of MaaS from both a facilitator and inhibitor perspective. To mitigate the confounding effect of group heterogeneity on the MaaS acceptance mechanism, the latent class clustering method was employed to naturally categorize respondents into three distinct groups: MaaS avoiders, wanderers and enthusiasts. A structural equation model was then developed to delineate the path of influence of users' intention to use and to contrast the differences in path coefficients between the different groups. The results show that individuals who are most dependent on public transport are not necessarily the most willing to use MaaS, while those who have used car-sharing services are more likely to adopt MaaS. It also highlights that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to promoting MaaS adoption, as different groups of people have different preferences, needs and concerns about the service. MaaS avoiders are predominantly middle-aged and older individuals with lower incomes, whose reluctance to switch stems from the associated transition costs, which create inertia. To encourage this group to adopt MaaS, operators should develop a gradual and user-friendly transition plan that minimizes complexity and addresses potential challenges such as unfamiliarity with the system and resistance to service changes. Conversely, MaaS wanderers’ willingness to engage with the service is strongly influenced by social influence and performance expectancy. Operators can increase their social media presence and raise awareness of the practicality of MaaS, helping to build an early customer base. In addition, the innovative mindset of MaaS enthusiasts plays a key role in their willingness to adopt the service, although operators must also be vigilant about privacy concerns and the risk of data breaches. Overall, this study enriches our understanding of the factors that shape MaaS adoption and provides actionable insights for improving services across different market segments.

Transport Economics and ManagementVol. 3
Dalian Maritime University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.