Flexural behavior of RC continuous beams strengthened with strain hardening cementitious composites

This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) continuous beams externally strengthened with strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) layers. Although other techniques for strengthening continuous RC beams have been studied, limited attention has been given to the use of SHCC in these applications, particularly with discontinuities at the mid-support due to column heads. By addressing these gaps, this research advances the understanding of SHCC applications for retrofitting and provides a more realistic structural solution for strengthening such beams. The experimental program involved flexural testing of five RC continuous beams: one un-strengthened control beam and four strengthened with SHCC layers at the mid-support negative moment region. The strengthening configurations included two beams strengthened with L-shaped SHCC layers and two beams strengthened with U-shaped SHCC layers, extending to either half or full beam height. To overcome discontinuity at the column head, CFRP laminates were added to the L-shaped SHCC configurations. The control beam exhibited an ultimate load of 392 kN, while the strengthened beams exhibited failure loads that ranged from 418 to 496 kN, with the U-shaped configuration showing the highest load capacity of 496 kN, a 27 % increase. Debonding occurred in the L-shaped strengthened beams, while no debonding was observed in the U-shaped beams. A finite-element-based numerical model was developed using ABAQUS and was validated using experimental data. The Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model was used for both concrete and SHCC, and cohesive surface-to-surface interaction was used to model the bond between the concrete and SHCC layers. The model showed good agreement with the experimental results and can be used for further parametric studies . This study concludes that SHCC strengthening is a viable solution for enhancing the flexural capacity of RC continuous beams. • Strengthening of RC continuous beams with SHCC layers was investigated. • One control beam and four strengthened beams were tested under flexural loading. • The L-shaped and U-shaped strengthening configurations were examined. • U-shaped configuration had the highest increase in load carrying capacity of 27 %. • No signs of debonding were detected in U-shaped beams, unlike in L-shaped beams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112033
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexural behavior of RC continuous beams strengthened with strain hardening cementitious composites

Ahmed Almaadawy, Ghada Mousa Hekal, Rami A. Hawileh, Magdy I. Salama et al.
2 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
article

Flexural behavior of RC continuous beams strengthened with strain hardening cementitious composites

Ahmed Almaadawy, Ghada Mousa Hekal, Rami A. Hawileh, Magdy I. Salama, Srishti Banerji, Nageh Meleka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) continuous beams externally strengthened with strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) layers. Although other techniques for strengthening continuous RC beams have been studied, limited attention has been given to the use of SHCC in these applications, particularly with discontinuities at the mid-support due to column heads. By addressing these gaps, this research advances the understanding of SHCC applications for retrofitting and provides a more realistic structural solution for strengthening such beams. The experimental program involved flexural testing of five RC continuous beams: one un-strengthened control beam and four strengthened with SHCC layers at the mid-support negative moment region. The strengthening configurations included two beams strengthened with L-shaped SHCC layers and two beams strengthened with U-shaped SHCC layers, extending to either half or full beam height. To overcome discontinuity at the column head, CFRP laminates were added to the L-shaped SHCC configurations. The control beam exhibited an ultimate load of 392 kN, while the strengthened beams exhibited failure loads that ranged from 418 to 496 kN, with the U-shaped configuration showing the highest load capacity of 496 kN, a 27 % increase. Debonding occurred in the L-shaped strengthened beams, while no debonding was observed in the U-shaped beams. A finite-element-based numerical model was developed using ABAQUS and was validated using experimental data. The Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model was used for both concrete and SHCC, and cohesive surface-to-surface interaction was used to model the bond between the concrete and SHCC layers. The model showed good agreement with the experimental results and can be used for further parametric studies . This study concludes that SHCC strengthening is a viable solution for enhancing the flexural capacity of RC continuous beams. • Strengthening of RC continuous beams with SHCC layers was investigated. • One control beam and four strengthened beams were tested under flexural loading. • The L-shaped and U-shaped strengthening configurations were examined. • U-shaped configuration had the highest increase in load carrying capacity of 27 %. • No signs of debonding were detected in U-shaped beams, unlike in L-shaped beams.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 103
Utah State University (US), Kafrelsheikh University (EG), American University of Sharjah (AE), Menoufia University (EG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.