Exploring Learners' Interactions with GenAI Agents in Educational Games: Typologies and Emotional Factors in Human-Computer Interaction

This study explores and compares learners' interactions with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) within an educational game context. Data from 365 dialogues were collected from 76 K12 students at a middle school in Suzhou, China, who had conversations with GenAI agents in an educational game environment. Drawing upon a framework adapted from the classification system of learners' online asynchronous discussions, six categories were utilized: social and affective (ES), information (Inf), questions (Q&A), ideas (ID), agency (EA), and meta-recapitulation (MA). The study revealed several important findings. Firstly, students' responses contained less information (Inf) and meta-recapitulation (MA) due to the limitations of GenAI in providing authoritative and external resources of information. Secondly, players’ social and affective outputs (ES) were associated with mixed emotions, with the majority of emotions experienced by the students being negative (82.02%), and the reasons behind these negative emotions include mistrust of GenAI during or prior to the game, GenAI misinterpreting players’ ideas, a mismatch with players’ expectations, and GenAI repeatedly outputting the same text. Overall, this study sheds light on the complex dynamics of learners' dialogues with GenAI in educational environment, highlighting the learning opportunities and challenges for improving AI-driven educational experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icet62460.2024.10868064
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Learners' Interactions with GenAI Agents in Educational Games: Typologies and Emotional Factors in Human-Computer Interaction

Xiulin Ruan, Wei Wei, Ziqi Chen, Ke Fang et al.
6 citations
Education and Learning Interventions
4.67
article

Exploring Learners' Interactions with GenAI Agents in Educational Games: Typologies and Emotional Factors in Human-Computer Interaction

Xiulin Ruan, Wei Wei, Ziqi Chen, Ke Fang, Shujing Jiang, Zhaoyang Xiong
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study explores and compares learners' interactions with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) within an educational game context. Data from 365 dialogues were collected from 76 K12 students at a middle school in Suzhou, China, who had conversations with GenAI agents in an educational game environment. Drawing upon a framework adapted from the classification system of learners' online asynchronous discussions, six categories were utilized: social and affective (ES), information (Inf), questions (Q&A), ideas (ID), agency (EA), and meta-recapitulation (MA). The study revealed several important findings. Firstly, students' responses contained less information (Inf) and meta-recapitulation (MA) due to the limitations of GenAI in providing authoritative and external resources of information. Secondly, players’ social and affective outputs (ES) were associated with mixed emotions, with the majority of emotions experienced by the students being negative (82.02%), and the reasons behind these negative emotions include mistrust of GenAI during or prior to the game, GenAI misinterpreting players’ ideas, a mismatch with players’ expectations, and GenAI repeatedly outputting the same text. Overall, this study sheds light on the complex dynamics of learners' dialogues with GenAI in educational environment, highlighting the learning opportunities and challenges for improving AI-driven educational experiences.

Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO), Tsinghua University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Learning Interventions
4.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.