Flood Forecasting with Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Analysis

Flood forecasting is one of the most disastrous natural phenomena; however, its prediction with sufficient accuracy can help to at least reduce the damage caused by this potentially disastrous event. Additionally, in this paper, a comparison of classical and quantum models for machine learning in flood forecasting is made. Traditional machine learning means have found wide use in view of this, particularly when there exist historical data and a number of environmental parameters. But with the strength that quantum computing holds, quantum machine learning models are poised for even better predictive accuracy and efficiency for the future, as they have the capability to process loads of data all at once. In this text, we implement both the classical models, such as the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forests, alongside quantum machine learning models. We compare on prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability. The results will point out the strengths and limitations of each approach, from which it will be possible to derive how quantum machine learning can complement or surpass the performances of classical methods for the improved reliability and timeliness of predictions in flood forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ic-sit63503.2024.10862894
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flood Forecasting with Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Analysis

Alankrita Aggarwal, Smritilekha Das, Balajee Maram, Sripelli Jagadish et al.
1 citations
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.21
article

Flood Forecasting with Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Analysis

Alankrita Aggarwal, Smritilekha Das, Balajee Maram, Sripelli Jagadish, R. Creesy, Madhavi Perla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Flood forecasting is one of the most disastrous natural phenomena; however, its prediction with sufficient accuracy can help to at least reduce the damage caused by this potentially disastrous event. Additionally, in this paper, a comparison of classical and quantum models for machine learning in flood forecasting is made. Traditional machine learning means have found wide use in view of this, particularly when there exist historical data and a number of environmental parameters. But with the strength that quantum computing holds, quantum machine learning models are poised for even better predictive accuracy and efficiency for the future, as they have the capability to process loads of data all at once. In this text, we implement both the classical models, such as the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forests, alongside quantum machine learning models. We compare on prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability. The results will point out the strengths and limitations of each approach, from which it will be possible to derive how quantum machine learning can complement or surpass the performances of classical methods for the improved reliability and timeliness of predictions in flood forecasting.

Chandigarh University (IN), Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flood Forecasting with Classical and Quantum Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Analysis — Alankrita Aggarwal, Smritilekha Das, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS