Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives and Strategies on Student Assessment Using Generative AI in Chinese Universities

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) provides changes to higher education, which has attracted widespread attention from researchers and educators. However, the existing research has not comprehensively examined how university teachers perceive the use of generative AI for student assessment and what strategies should be implemented when applying this technology in China. This study employed mixed-method research to explore teachers’ perceptions of student assessment using generative AI. We collected data through interviews and surveys from Chinese universities. Our findings demonstrate that a majority of teachers agreed with the power of AI tools to enhance the overall quality of the evaluation and their work efficiency, since they can alleviate the burden associated with manual grading and offer prompt feedback. University teachers expect to prepare their knowledge and skills for the usage of new technologies through training programs and professional development opportunities. Besides, this study notes some concerns like data security and privacy fairness, biases inherent in AI algorithms, overreliance on automation, and limited critical human thinking. These challenges lead to the need for further explorations to provide holistic feedback and balance the AI assessment approach with human judgment to meet reasonable standards. This study provides a general introduction to AI-assisted assessment transformation in the university setting, and more empirical inquiries on different types, phases, objectives, and strategies of assessment in practices are suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icet62460.2024.10868002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives and Strategies on Student Assessment Using Generative AI in Chinese Universities

Min Xiao, Weiwei Ma, Yuting Zhang
3 citations
Online Learning and Analytics
1.24
article

Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives and Strategies on Student Assessment Using Generative AI in Chinese Universities

Min Xiao, Weiwei Ma, Yuting Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) provides changes to higher education, which has attracted widespread attention from researchers and educators. However, the existing research has not comprehensively examined how university teachers perceive the use of generative AI for student assessment and what strategies should be implemented when applying this technology in China. This study employed mixed-method research to explore teachers’ perceptions of student assessment using generative AI. We collected data through interviews and surveys from Chinese universities. Our findings demonstrate that a majority of teachers agreed with the power of AI tools to enhance the overall quality of the evaluation and their work efficiency, since they can alleviate the burden associated with manual grading and offer prompt feedback. University teachers expect to prepare their knowledge and skills for the usage of new technologies through training programs and professional development opportunities. Besides, this study notes some concerns like data security and privacy fairness, biases inherent in AI algorithms, overreliance on automation, and limited critical human thinking. These challenges lead to the need for further explorations to provide holistic feedback and balance the AI assessment approach with human judgment to meet reasonable standards. This study provides a general introduction to AI-assisted assessment transformation in the university setting, and more empirical inquiries on different types, phases, objectives, and strategies of assessment in practices are suggested.

Zhejiang Normal University (CN), Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University (CN), Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives and Strategies on Student Assessment Using Generative AI in Chinese Universities — Min Xiao, Weiwei Ma, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS