Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy

Structural variants (SVs) have been associated with changes in gene expression, which may contribute to alterations in phenotypes and disease development. However, the precise identification and characterization of SVs remain challenging. While long-read sequencing offers superior accuracy for SV detection, short-read sequencing remains essential due to practical and cost considerations, as well as the need to analyze existing short-read datasets. Numerous algorithms for short-read SV detection exist, but none are universally optimal, each having limitations for specific SV sizes and types. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of six advanced SV detection algorithms, including the commercial software DRAGEN, using the GIAB v0.6 Tier 1 benchmark and HGSVC2 cell lines. We employed both individual and combination strategies, with systematic assessments of recall, precision, and F1 scores. Our results demonstrate that the union combination approach enhanced detection capabilities, surpassing single algorithms in identifying deletions and insertions, and delivered comparable recall and F1 scores to the commercial software DRAGEN. Interestingly, expanding the number of algorithms from three to five in the combination did not enhance performance, highlighting the efficiency of a well-chosen ensemble over a larger algorithmic pool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314982
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy

Pin-Xuan Chen, Pei‐Lung Chen, An‐Ko Chung, Yu-Shu Huang et al.
4 citations
PLoS ONE
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.22
article

Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy

Pin-Xuan Chen, Pei‐Lung Chen, An‐Ko Chung, Yu-Shu Huang, Chin-Yi Cheng, Jacob Shujui Hsu, Yuan Chen, Demin Duan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) have been associated with changes in gene expression, which may contribute to alterations in phenotypes and disease development. However, the precise identification and characterization of SVs remain challenging. While long-read sequencing offers superior accuracy for SV detection, short-read sequencing remains essential due to practical and cost considerations, as well as the need to analyze existing short-read datasets. Numerous algorithms for short-read SV detection exist, but none are universally optimal, each having limitations for specific SV sizes and types. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of six advanced SV detection algorithms, including the commercial software DRAGEN, using the GIAB v0.6 Tier 1 benchmark and HGSVC2 cell lines. We employed both individual and combination strategies, with systematic assessments of recall, precision, and F1 scores. Our results demonstrate that the union combination approach enhanced detection capabilities, surpassing single algorithms in identifying deletions and insertions, and delivered comparable recall and F1 scores to the commercial software DRAGEN. Interestingly, expanding the number of algorithms from three to five in the combination did not enhance performance, highlighting the efficiency of a well-chosen ensemble over a larger algorithmic pool.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(2)
National Taiwan University (TW), Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Academia Sinica (TW)
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.