Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle

• Virtual fence (VF) technology is rapidly developing and being adopted, but many ranchers and consumers have questions about its effect on the welfare of range beef cattle. • We conducted two studies using either VF collars or conventional electric fencing to rotationally graze beef cattle. We measured several common physiological and behavioral indicators of stress and correlated these indicators with the number of electric stimuli received from the VF collars. • Physiological and behavioral indicators of stress were not different between cattle rotated within the two types of fencing. No correlations were evident between the number of electrical stimuli received and stress indicators. From the perspective of cattle welfare, we concluded that continued development and use of VF is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rangelands
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2024.11.002
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle

Laura E. Goodman, Ryan R Reuter, Andrew P Foote, Todd Parker et al.
6 citations
Rangelands
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
11.42
article

Virtual fences are not more stressful than conventional electric fences in rotationally stocked beef cattle

Laura E. Goodman, Ryan R Reuter, Andrew P Foote, Todd Parker, Blake K Wilson, Kevin L. Wagner, Jancy Jeffus
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Virtual fence (VF) technology is rapidly developing and being adopted, but many ranchers and consumers have questions about its effect on the welfare of range beef cattle. • We conducted two studies using either VF collars or conventional electric fencing to rotationally graze beef cattle. We measured several common physiological and behavioral indicators of stress and correlated these indicators with the number of electric stimuli received from the VF collars. • Physiological and behavioral indicators of stress were not different between cattle rotated within the two types of fencing. No correlations were evident between the number of electrical stimuli received and stress indicators. From the perspective of cattle welfare, we concluded that continued development and use of VF is warranted.

RangelandsVol. 47(1)
Oklahoma State University (US), Mercy Health (US)
Oklahoma Soil Fertility Research and Education Advisory Board, Nature Conservancy, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Oklahoma Water Resources Center, Oklahoma State University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
11.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.