A General Framework to Assess Complex Heterogeneity in the Strength of a Surrogate Marker

A surrogate marker is a biological measurement in a clinical trial that aims to replace the primary outcome in evaluating the treatment effect, and can be measured earlier, with less cost, or with less patient burden. In theory, once a surrogate is validated, future studies can evaluate treatment efficacy using only the surrogate. While there are many methods to evaluate a surrogate, these methods rarely account for heterogeneity in surrogacy, that is, when a surrogate is valid for only certain people. We propose a general framework for the assessment of complex heterogeneity in the strength of a surrogate marker, as well as corresponding parametric and semiparametric estimation procedures. Our framework defines the proportion of the treatment effect on the primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate, as a function of multiple baseline covariates, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \mathbf{W} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> . We additionally propose a formal test of heterogeneity and a method to identify a region of the covariate space where the surrogate is sufficiently strong. We examine the performance of our methods via a simulation study featuring varying levels of heterogeneity and use our methods to examine potential heterogeneity in the strength of a surrogate in an AIDS clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70001
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A General Framework to Assess Complex Heterogeneity in the Strength of a Surrogate Marker

Lü Tian, Layla Parast, Rebecca Kathryn Knowlton
4 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
10.52
article

A General Framework to Assess Complex Heterogeneity in the Strength of a Surrogate Marker

Lü Tian, Layla Parast, Rebecca Kathryn Knowlton
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A surrogate marker is a biological measurement in a clinical trial that aims to replace the primary outcome in evaluating the treatment effect, and can be measured earlier, with less cost, or with less patient burden. In theory, once a surrogate is validated, future studies can evaluate treatment efficacy using only the surrogate. While there are many methods to evaluate a surrogate, these methods rarely account for heterogeneity in surrogacy, that is, when a surrogate is valid for only certain people. We propose a general framework for the assessment of complex heterogeneity in the strength of a surrogate marker, as well as corresponding parametric and semiparametric estimation procedures. Our framework defines the proportion of the treatment effect on the primary outcome that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate, as a function of multiple baseline covariates, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ \mathbf{W} $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> . We additionally propose a formal test of heterogeneity and a method to identify a region of the covariate space where the surrogate is sufficiently strong. We examine the performance of our methods via a simulation study featuring varying levels of heterogeneity and use our methods to examine potential heterogeneity in the strength of a surrogate in an AIDS clinical trial.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(5)
The University of Texas at Austin (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
10.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.