Analysis of Degradation and Electrochemical Behavior of Lithium–Oxygen Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions

Lithium–oxygen batteries have garnered much attention in the past decades due to their high energy density and active material abundancy. Decreasing the electrolyte volume is critical to achieving a high energy density for practical applications. Recent works have demonstrated a serious performance limitation at lower electrolyte fillings. In this work, we study specifically the difference between flooded and lean electrolyte lithium–oxygen batteries by systematically tracing the source of performance degradation. We find that the key contributor to the decrease in performance under lean electrolyte conditions stems from the lithium metal anode rather than the cathode. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) compositionally appears to be the same from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy but the coverage is less uniform, and impedance is much higher under lean electrolyte conditions. Such an effect likely produced the observed poorer cycle performance at 10 μL cm–2 (∼28% cathode’s pore volume filled) vs 100 μL cm–2 (278% of cathode’s pore volume) at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm–2 (0.1 mAh cm–2) using an electrolyte composition of 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c07743
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Degradation and Electrochemical Behavior of Lithium–Oxygen Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions

Hernán B. Rodríguez, Daniel Córdoba, Khalil Amine, Ernesto J. Calvo et al.
3 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
article

Analysis of Degradation and Electrochemical Behavior of Lithium–Oxygen Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions

Hernán B. Rodríguez, Daniel Córdoba, Khalil Amine, Ernesto J. Calvo, Seoung‐Bum Son, Matthew Li, Xiaozhou Huang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Lithium–oxygen batteries have garnered much attention in the past decades due to their high energy density and active material abundancy. Decreasing the electrolyte volume is critical to achieving a high energy density for practical applications. Recent works have demonstrated a serious performance limitation at lower electrolyte fillings. In this work, we study specifically the difference between flooded and lean electrolyte lithium–oxygen batteries by systematically tracing the source of performance degradation. We find that the key contributor to the decrease in performance under lean electrolyte conditions stems from the lithium metal anode rather than the cathode. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) compositionally appears to be the same from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy but the coverage is less uniform, and impedance is much higher under lean electrolyte conditions. Such an effect likely produced the observed poorer cycle performance at 10 μL cm–2 (∼28% cathode’s pore volume filled) vs 100 μL cm–2 (278% of cathode’s pore volume) at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm–2 (0.1 mAh cm–2) using an electrolyte composition of 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 129(7)
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Institute of Astronomy and Space Physics (AR), Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (AR)
Argonne National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.