How Far has Globalization Gone? A Tale of Two Regions

ABSTRACT We study the evolution of trade globalization in Latin America and Asia over the period 1995–2018 and quantify its economic impact. Using structural a gravity estimation, we estimate a proxy of trade globalization that captures the ease of trading internationally with respect to trading domestically. Results indicate similar trade globalization patterns between the two regions, but a great degree of heterogeneity within them. Trade globalization has been particularly strong in agriculture, mining, and manufacturing, but has lagged in services. Next, we quantify the economic implications of the estimated globalization trends. Simulations of a multi‐country four‐sector trade model point to heterogeneous long‐term impacts of globalization on GDP—some countries exhibiting substantial gains and others experiencing large losses—, with no single sector playing a preponderant role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Economics
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12791
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Far has Globalization Gone? A Tale of Two Regions

Jacopo Timini, Rodolfo G. Campos, Samuel Pienknagura
1 citations
Review of International Economics
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

How Far has Globalization Gone? A Tale of Two Regions

Jacopo Timini, Rodolfo G. Campos, Samuel Pienknagura
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study the evolution of trade globalization in Latin America and Asia over the period 1995–2018 and quantify its economic impact. Using structural a gravity estimation, we estimate a proxy of trade globalization that captures the ease of trading internationally with respect to trading domestically. Results indicate similar trade globalization patterns between the two regions, but a great degree of heterogeneity within them. Trade globalization has been particularly strong in agriculture, mining, and manufacturing, but has lagged in services. Next, we quantify the economic implications of the estimated globalization trends. Simulations of a multi‐country four‐sector trade model point to heterogeneous long‐term impacts of globalization on GDP—some countries exhibiting substantial gains and others experiencing large losses—, with no single sector playing a preponderant role.

Review of International EconomicsVol. 33(3)
Bank of Spain (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.