Discrimination in games under the veil of ignorance

Abstract In this paper, we study descriptive norms under the veil of ignorance in symmetric coordination and anti-coordination games. We consider a finite population formed by different types of individuals. Players observe the type of their opponent but play under the veil of ignorance, i.e., act as if they did not know their own type. The question that we address is whether in such a symmetric environment a discriminating norm may arise. We show that there exist symmetric Nash equilibria in which players discriminate by acting differently according to the type of opponent that they face in anti-coordination games, while no such equilibrium exists in coordination games. Whenever individuals display a discriminating behavior, it is equally adopted by all agents, including by the individuals of the discriminated group. However, discrimination has a limit: the maximum number of groups where the treatment differs is three.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Game Theory
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-025-00925-7
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrimination in games under the veil of ignorance

André Barreira da Silva Rocha, Annick Laruelle
International Journal of Game Theory
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Discrimination in games under the veil of ignorance

André Barreira da Silva Rocha, Annick Laruelle
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we study descriptive norms under the veil of ignorance in symmetric coordination and anti-coordination games. We consider a finite population formed by different types of individuals. Players observe the type of their opponent but play under the veil of ignorance, i.e., act as if they did not know their own type. The question that we address is whether in such a symmetric environment a discriminating norm may arise. We show that there exist symmetric Nash equilibria in which players discriminate by acting differently according to the type of opponent that they face in anti-coordination games, while no such equilibrium exists in coordination games. Whenever individuals display a discriminating behavior, it is equally adopted by all agents, including by the individuals of the discriminated group. However, discrimination has a limit: the maximum number of groups where the treatment differs is three.

International Journal of Game TheoryVol. 54(1)
Ikerbasque (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Eusko Jaurlaritza, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discrimination in games under the veil of ignorance — André Barreira da Silva Rocha, Annick Laruelle · International Journal of Game Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS