Systematic Review of Self-Reported Multidimensional Instruments Used to Measure Quality of Life and Subjective Well-Being of Children and Adolescents

Abstract There is a growing interest in measuring quality of life (QoL) and subjective well-being (SWB) to assess societal progress and well-being. Despite numerous studies exploring the QoL and SWB of adult populations, there has been a limited number of studies focusing on young people. Measuring QoL and SWB of children and adolescents provides valuable insights into shaping public policies aimed at promoting their well-being. This study aims to conduct systematic reviews of self-reported multidimensional measures assessing the QoL and SWB of children and adolescents along with their psychometric properties. The first stage identified the measures of interest, followed by the second stage focused on finding validation studies for the identified measures. Both systematic reviews followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight databases were searched to retrieve the studies. During the first stage, a total of 29 measures used to assess the QoL and SWB of children and adolescents were identified. Subsequently, 68 validation studies that met the eligibility criteria were identified during the second stage. This study reports the key characteristics of each instrument and the policy-relevant life domains that are commonly captured by these instruments. Their psychometric properties are discussed. The findings of the study will facilitate policymakers and researchers to make a choice of validated measure(s) for their specific application to improve the well-being of children and adolescents. Besides, they will assist in developing new paediatric QoL or SWB measures when appropriate measures are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Indicators Research
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03533-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review of Self-Reported Multidimensional Instruments Used to Measure Quality of Life and Subjective Well-Being of Children and Adolescents

Gozde Aydin, Kaung Mon Winn, Maame Esi Woode, Gang Chen
5 citations
Social Indicators Research
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
17.47
article

Systematic Review of Self-Reported Multidimensional Instruments Used to Measure Quality of Life and Subjective Well-Being of Children and Adolescents

Gozde Aydin, Kaung Mon Winn, Maame Esi Woode, Gang Chen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is a growing interest in measuring quality of life (QoL) and subjective well-being (SWB) to assess societal progress and well-being. Despite numerous studies exploring the QoL and SWB of adult populations, there has been a limited number of studies focusing on young people. Measuring QoL and SWB of children and adolescents provides valuable insights into shaping public policies aimed at promoting their well-being. This study aims to conduct systematic reviews of self-reported multidimensional measures assessing the QoL and SWB of children and adolescents along with their psychometric properties. The first stage identified the measures of interest, followed by the second stage focused on finding validation studies for the identified measures. Both systematic reviews followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eight databases were searched to retrieve the studies. During the first stage, a total of 29 measures used to assess the QoL and SWB of children and adolescents were identified. Subsequently, 68 validation studies that met the eligibility criteria were identified during the second stage. This study reports the key characteristics of each instrument and the policy-relevant life domains that are commonly captured by these instruments. Their psychometric properties are discussed. The findings of the study will facilitate policymakers and researchers to make a choice of validated measure(s) for their specific application to improve the well-being of children and adolescents. Besides, they will assist in developing new paediatric QoL or SWB measures when appropriate measures are not available.

Social Indicators ResearchVol. 177(2)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Cancer Australia (AU), Caulfield Hospital (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
Monash University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
17.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.