Do engagement best practices motivate preparedness intentions? Data from earthquake workshops for Spanish speakers

Communities exposed to Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes have diverse information needs. However, information about earthquake risk is often developed for general audiences and is rarely tested for its effectiveness at improving risk understanding or preparedness intentions for those general audiences, let alone ethnic minorities. Best practices in risk communication suggest that providing information that is personalized, clear, and culturally appropriate will improve people's willingness to engage with the material and improve learning outcomes. This study reports the test of a 2-h earthquake preparedness workshop that was based on active learning principles, addressed earthquake impacts, preparedness actions, and included goal setting activities to motivate participants' preparedness. We engaged local facilitators to deliver a culturally appropriate workshop in Spanish to 52 participants online and in-person. A pretest/posttest evaluation revealed significant increases in expected earthquake consequences, risk area accuracy for shaking zone and liquefaction zone, positive affect, self-efficacy, and, most important, preparedness intentions. These results indicate that an active learning strategy is an effective method of risk communication. However, further research is needed to identify ways to change the variables that had weak or nonsignificant impacts and to determine if the preparedness intentions ultimately produce preparedness actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17712
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do engagement best practices motivate preparedness intentions? Data from earthquake workshops for Spanish speakers

Carson MacPherson‐Krutsky, Brittany D. Brand, Michael K. Lindell
3 citations
Risk Analysis
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.60
article

Do engagement best practices motivate preparedness intentions? Data from earthquake workshops for Spanish speakers

Carson MacPherson‐Krutsky, Brittany D. Brand, Michael K. Lindell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Communities exposed to Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes have diverse information needs. However, information about earthquake risk is often developed for general audiences and is rarely tested for its effectiveness at improving risk understanding or preparedness intentions for those general audiences, let alone ethnic minorities. Best practices in risk communication suggest that providing information that is personalized, clear, and culturally appropriate will improve people's willingness to engage with the material and improve learning outcomes. This study reports the test of a 2-h earthquake preparedness workshop that was based on active learning principles, addressed earthquake impacts, preparedness actions, and included goal setting activities to motivate participants' preparedness. We engaged local facilitators to deliver a culturally appropriate workshop in Spanish to 52 participants online and in-person. A pretest/posttest evaluation revealed significant increases in expected earthquake consequences, risk area accuracy for shaking zone and liquefaction zone, positive affect, self-efficacy, and, most important, preparedness intentions. These results indicate that an active learning strategy is an effective method of risk communication. However, further research is needed to identify ways to change the variables that had weak or nonsignificant impacts and to determine if the preparedness intentions ultimately produce preparedness actions.

Risk AnalysisVol. 45(7)
Boise State University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Science Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.