High-achieving students in mathematics: A heterogeneous group

Although high-achieving students in mathematics are often regarded as a homogeneous group, there may be differences within this group. This study used a person-centred approach to investigate quantitative and qualitative differences between 625 high-achieving students (top 20 %) of Grades 3–6 in the Netherlands. Latent profile analyses were conducted based on a range of cognitive (nonverbal intelligence, verbal working memory and visual-spatial working memory), motivational (interest, perceived competence, and anxiety), and mathematics achievement (general mathematics achievement and arithmetic fluency) measures. Per grade, two to four latent profiles emerged (e.g., in Grade 3: ‘relatively low on all variables’, ‘relatively uninterested very high achievers’ and ‘motivated’). While the variation on all variables was substantial, motivational variables contributed most to the distinction between the profiles. This heterogeneity among high-achievers implies that high-achieving students may have diverse educational needs to flourish and reach their full mathematical potential. • High-achievers in mathematics are often regarded as a homogeneous group in research. • This study shows there is substantial heterogeneity among high-achieving students. • Students differ in level and pattern of math achievement, cognition and motivation. • Motivational variables contribute most to the heterogeneity. • High-achieving boys and girls are mostly distributed equally across the profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102629
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-achieving students in mathematics: A heterogeneous group

Emilie J. Prast, Eva van de Weijer‐Bergsma, Marian Hickendorff
1 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
article

High-achieving students in mathematics: A heterogeneous group

Emilie J. Prast, Eva van de Weijer‐Bergsma, Marian Hickendorff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although high-achieving students in mathematics are often regarded as a homogeneous group, there may be differences within this group. This study used a person-centred approach to investigate quantitative and qualitative differences between 625 high-achieving students (top 20 %) of Grades 3–6 in the Netherlands. Latent profile analyses were conducted based on a range of cognitive (nonverbal intelligence, verbal working memory and visual-spatial working memory), motivational (interest, perceived competence, and anxiety), and mathematics achievement (general mathematics achievement and arithmetic fluency) measures. Per grade, two to four latent profiles emerged (e.g., in Grade 3: ‘relatively low on all variables’, ‘relatively uninterested very high achievers’ and ‘motivated’). While the variation on all variables was substantial, motivational variables contributed most to the distinction between the profiles. This heterogeneity among high-achievers implies that high-achieving students may have diverse educational needs to flourish and reach their full mathematical potential. • High-achievers in mathematics are often regarded as a homogeneous group in research. • This study shows there is substantial heterogeneity among high-achieving students. • Students differ in level and pattern of math achievement, cognition and motivation. • Motivational variables contribute most to the heterogeneity. • High-achieving boys and girls are mostly distributed equally across the profiles.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 119
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.