No‐Reference Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future

ABSTRACT No‐reference image quality assessment (NR‐IQA) has garnered significant attention due to its critical role in various image processing applications. This survey provides a comprehensive and systematic review of NR‐IQA methods, datasets, and challenges, offering new perspectives and insights for the field. Specifically, we propose a novel taxonomy for NR‐IQA methods based on distortion scenarios and design principles, which distinguishes this work from previous surveys. Representative methods within each category are thoroughly examined, with a focus on their strengths, limitations, and performance characteristics. Additionally, we review 20 widely used NR‐IQA datasets that serve as benchmarks for evaluating these methods, providing detailed information on the number of images, distortion types, and distortion levels for each dataset. Furthermore, we identify and discuss key challenges currently faced by NR‐IQA methods, such as handling diverse and complex distortions, ensuring generalisation across datasets and devices, and achieving real‐time performance. We also suggest potential future research directions to address these issues. In summary, this survey offers a comprehensive and systematic examination of NR‐IQA methods, datasets, and challenges, offering valuable insights and guidance for researchers and practitioners working in the NR‐IQA domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13842
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Image and Video Quality Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No‐Reference Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future

Qingyu Mao, Qilei Li, Gwanggil Jeon, Hyunbum Kim et al.
11 citations
Expert Systems
Image and Video Quality Assessment
14.04
article

No‐Reference Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future

Qingyu Mao, Qilei Li, Gwanggil Jeon, Hyunbum Kim, David Camacho, Shuai Liu
article en
11 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT No‐reference image quality assessment (NR‐IQA) has garnered significant attention due to its critical role in various image processing applications. This survey provides a comprehensive and systematic review of NR‐IQA methods, datasets, and challenges, offering new perspectives and insights for the field. Specifically, we propose a novel taxonomy for NR‐IQA methods based on distortion scenarios and design principles, which distinguishes this work from previous surveys. Representative methods within each category are thoroughly examined, with a focus on their strengths, limitations, and performance characteristics. Additionally, we review 20 widely used NR‐IQA datasets that serve as benchmarks for evaluating these methods, providing detailed information on the number of images, distortion types, and distortion levels for each dataset. Furthermore, we identify and discuss key challenges currently faced by NR‐IQA methods, such as handling diverse and complex distortions, ensuring generalisation across datasets and devices, and achieving real‐time performance. We also suggest potential future research directions to address these issues. In summary, this survey offers a comprehensive and systematic examination of NR‐IQA methods, datasets, and challenges, offering valuable insights and guidance for researchers and practitioners working in the NR‐IQA domain.

Expert SystemsVol. 42(3)
Incheon National University (KR), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Shenzhen University (CN), Shenzhen Technology University (CN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Image and Video Quality Assessment
14.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No‐Reference Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future — Qingyu Mao, Qilei Li, et al. · Expert Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS