Do Elections Promote Conflict? A Quantitative Text Analysis of Postwar Iraqi News Coverage

This article seeks to investigate whether conflict‐motivating coverage in newspapers increases during the election period, employing a quantitative text analysis of several major newspapers in postwar Iraq. In the aftermath of the war in Iraq, the exclusion or inclusion of the former Baathist regime emerged as one of the most contentious issues in elections. Consequently, this study analyzes how the exclusion or inclusion of the former regime was asserted during election periods and the degree of emphasis in reporting, aiming to identify conflict‐inspiring coverage during elections. The analysis encompasses over 500,000 articles from various prominent newspapers. In summary, while election cycles typically feature coverage that denies inclusiveness and exacerbates fragmentation, official government‐affiliated newspapers tend to consistently underscore inclusiveness, even during election periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Developing Economies
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12422
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Elections Promote Conflict? A Quantitative Text Analysis of Postwar Iraqi News Coverage

Dai Yamao
1 citations
The Developing Economies
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
0.96
article

Do Elections Promote Conflict? A Quantitative Text Analysis of Postwar Iraqi News Coverage

Dai Yamao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article seeks to investigate whether conflict‐motivating coverage in newspapers increases during the election period, employing a quantitative text analysis of several major newspapers in postwar Iraq. In the aftermath of the war in Iraq, the exclusion or inclusion of the former Baathist regime emerged as one of the most contentious issues in elections. Consequently, this study analyzes how the exclusion or inclusion of the former regime was asserted during election periods and the degree of emphasis in reporting, aiming to identify conflict‐inspiring coverage during elections. The analysis encompasses over 500,000 articles from various prominent newspapers. In summary, while election cycles typically feature coverage that denies inclusiveness and exacerbates fragmentation, official government‐affiliated newspapers tend to consistently underscore inclusiveness, even during election periods.

The Developing EconomiesVol. 63(1)
Kyushu University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
0.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.