Protest as a relational field: An analysis of brokerage positions within and across contentious episodes and the individuals occupying them

This paper analyses participation in multiple protest episodes to explore the potential for people to broker relations between same-issue and different-issue episodes. Through an analysis of original survey data from six European countries, we map two-mode networks of individuals and protest episodes in each country to identify protesters in two brokerage positions: coordinators that can broker relations via same-issue contentious episodes and boundary spanners, that can broker relations via different-issue episodes. Combining network and regression analysis, we identify the individuals occupying such positions and characterize their protest participation. We find that embeddedness in different types of activist networks is the most important predictor of brokerage positions. However, the two brokerage positions are associated with different types of embeddedness. By fleshing out the importance of individuals in shaping contentious fields, we offer a unique insight into protest networks, thus advancing the sociological understanding of collective action with an innovative mixed-methods design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sociology
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2025.2458419
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protest as a relational field: An analysis of brokerage positions within and across contentious episodes and the individuals occupying them

Dan Mercea, Matthias Hoffmann, Felipe G. Santos
International Journal of Sociology
Social Media and Politics
article

Protest as a relational field: An analysis of brokerage positions within and across contentious episodes and the individuals occupying them

Dan Mercea, Matthias Hoffmann, Felipe G. Santos
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses participation in multiple protest episodes to explore the potential for people to broker relations between same-issue and different-issue episodes. Through an analysis of original survey data from six European countries, we map two-mode networks of individuals and protest episodes in each country to identify protesters in two brokerage positions: coordinators that can broker relations via same-issue contentious episodes and boundary spanners, that can broker relations via different-issue episodes. Combining network and regression analysis, we identify the individuals occupying such positions and characterize their protest participation. We find that embeddedness in different types of activist networks is the most important predictor of brokerage positions. However, the two brokerage positions are associated with different types of embeddedness. By fleshing out the importance of individuals in shaping contentious fields, we offer a unique insight into protest networks, thus advancing the sociological understanding of collective action with an innovative mixed-methods design.

International Journal of SociologyVol. 55(4)
City, University of London (GB), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Protest as a relational field: An analysis of brokerage positions within and across contentious episodes and the individuals occupying them — Dan Mercea, Matthias Hoffmann, et al. · International Journal of Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS