Statistical Inference for Association Studies in the Presence of Binary Outcome Misclassification

In biomedical and public health association studies, binary outcome variables may be subject to misclassification, resulting in substantial bias in effect estimates. The feasibility of addressing binary outcome misclassification in regression models is often hindered by model identifiability issues. In this paper, we characterize the identifiability problems in this class of models as a specific case of "label-switching" and leverage a pattern in the resulting parameter estimates to solve the permutation invariance of the complete data log-likelihood. Our proposed algorithm in binary outcome misclassification models does not require gold standard labels and relies only on the assumption that the sum of the sensitivity and specificity exceeds 1. A label-switching correction is applied within estimation methods to recover unbiased effect estimates and to estimate misclassification rates. Open-source software is provided to implement the proposed methods. We give a detailed simulation study for our proposed methodology and apply these methods to data from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10316
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Inference for Association Studies in the Presence of Binary Outcome Misclassification

Martin T. Wells, Kimberly A. Hochstedler Webb
2 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
5.26
article

Statistical Inference for Association Studies in the Presence of Binary Outcome Misclassification

Martin T. Wells, Kimberly A. Hochstedler Webb
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In biomedical and public health association studies, binary outcome variables may be subject to misclassification, resulting in substantial bias in effect estimates. The feasibility of addressing binary outcome misclassification in regression models is often hindered by model identifiability issues. In this paper, we characterize the identifiability problems in this class of models as a specific case of "label-switching" and leverage a pattern in the resulting parameter estimates to solve the permutation invariance of the complete data log-likelihood. Our proposed algorithm in binary outcome misclassification models does not require gold standard labels and relies only on the assumption that the sum of the sensitivity and specificity exceeds 1. A label-switching correction is applied within estimation methods to recover unbiased effect estimates and to estimate misclassification rates. Open-source software is provided to implement the proposed methods. We give a detailed simulation study for our proposed methodology and apply these methods to data from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(5)
Cornell University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
5.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Statistical Inference for Association Studies in the Presence of Binary Outcome Misclassification — Martin T. Wells, Kimberly A. Hochstedler Webb · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS