The Buckeye Wellness Innovator Program: A Quality Improvement Evaluation

Background: Wellness champion networks are a best practice strategy to promote and sustain a culture of well-being in organizations and institutions of higher education. Aim: The purpose of this quality improvement evaluation was to determine program effectiveness and areas of opportunity for a university wellness champion program. Methods: An anonymous survey was sent to 700 wellness champions, the Buckeye Wellness Innovators (BWIs), to assess program components, identify areas of opportunity, and gather participant feedback. Results: A total of 202 BWIs (28.8%) responded to the survey. Seventy-five percent reported at least moderate engagement in the role. There was a strong desire among respondents to contribute to the university’s wellness initiative. Areas of opportunity include further colleague engagement in wellness services and programs, enhanced communication from program facilitators, and continued and increased support for the wellness champion role. Conclusions: Feedback on the program was positive overall. Several areas of opportunity for program improvement were identified. Wellness champions are an effective evidence-based strategy to support a culture of wellness in institutions of higher education and their feedback is important for program quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18061/bhac.v9i1.10034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Buckeye Wellness Innovator Program: A Quality Improvement Evaluation

Nicole Johnson, Megan Amaya, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Nives Quaye et al.
1 citations
Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

The Buckeye Wellness Innovator Program: A Quality Improvement Evaluation

Nicole Johnson, Megan Amaya, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Nives Quaye, Andy Wapner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Wellness champion networks are a best practice strategy to promote and sustain a culture of well-being in organizations and institutions of higher education. Aim: The purpose of this quality improvement evaluation was to determine program effectiveness and areas of opportunity for a university wellness champion program. Methods: An anonymous survey was sent to 700 wellness champions, the Buckeye Wellness Innovators (BWIs), to assess program components, identify areas of opportunity, and gather participant feedback. Results: A total of 202 BWIs (28.8%) responded to the survey. Seventy-five percent reported at least moderate engagement in the role. There was a strong desire among respondents to contribute to the university’s wellness initiative. Areas of opportunity include further colleague engagement in wellness services and programs, enhanced communication from program facilitators, and continued and increased support for the wellness champion role. Conclusions: Feedback on the program was positive overall. Several areas of opportunity for program improvement were identified. Wellness champions are an effective evidence-based strategy to support a culture of wellness in institutions of higher education and their feedback is important for program quality improvement.

Building Healthy Academic Communities JournalVol. 9(1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.