Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: comparing traditional and advanced clustering protocols

Abstract Wireless networks have experienced tremendous growth, particularly in the telecommunications sector, with various technologies such as cellular networks, Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN), Bluetooth, Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs), Ultra-WideBand (UWB), and Wi-Max. Multi-hop wireless networks, composed of diverse devices like wireless transceivers, provide advanced storage, forwarding capabilities, and efficient media access techniques. Among these, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have gained significant attention due to their versatility and applications in military, environmental monitoring, and smart infrastructure. The increasing use of WSNs in energy-constrained environments has necessitated the development of energy-efficient protocols to extend network lifetime and improve overall performance. This study conducts a comprehensive simulation-based evaluation of various energy-efficient clustering protocols for WSNs, focusing on Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH), Improved-LEACH (I-LEACH), Hybrid Energy-Efficient Distributed Clustering (HEED), Power-Efficient GAthering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS), Energy-Efficient Cluster Head (EECH), Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA), and Termite Colony Optimization (TCO). Key performance metrics such as Total Energy Consumption (TEC), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput, Packet Loss, Cumulative Energy Consumption (CEC), and Residual Energy (RE) were analyzed to identify protocol-specific strengths and weaknesses. The simulation results reveal significant differences in protocol performance, with FPA demonstrating superior energy efficiency and network reliability, achieving improvements of up to 30% in TEC, 35% in throughput, 7% in PDR, 12% in packet loss, 20% in CEC, and 25% in RE compared to other protocols. These findings provide valuable insights into the trade-offs associated with clustering protocols, aiding in the selection of the most suitable methodology for specific WSN applications. The research work advances the understanding of clustering protocols by presenting a data-driven comparative analysis that evaluates their fitness for energy-constrained scenarios. The study contributes to optimizing protocol selection for enhanced network lifetime and performance, paving the way for more efficient WSN deployments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research Express
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/adb37b
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: comparing traditional and advanced clustering protocols

Manjit Singh, Satveer Kour, Shinder Kaur
9 citations
Engineering Research Express
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
13.38
article

Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: comparing traditional and advanced clustering protocols

Manjit Singh, Satveer Kour, Shinder Kaur
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Wireless networks have experienced tremendous growth, particularly in the telecommunications sector, with various technologies such as cellular networks, Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN), Bluetooth, Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs), Ultra-WideBand (UWB), and Wi-Max. Multi-hop wireless networks, composed of diverse devices like wireless transceivers, provide advanced storage, forwarding capabilities, and efficient media access techniques. Among these, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have gained significant attention due to their versatility and applications in military, environmental monitoring, and smart infrastructure. The increasing use of WSNs in energy-constrained environments has necessitated the development of energy-efficient protocols to extend network lifetime and improve overall performance. This study conducts a comprehensive simulation-based evaluation of various energy-efficient clustering protocols for WSNs, focusing on Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH), Improved-LEACH (I-LEACH), Hybrid Energy-Efficient Distributed Clustering (HEED), Power-Efficient GAthering in Sensor Information Systems (PEGASIS), Energy-Efficient Cluster Head (EECH), Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA), and Termite Colony Optimization (TCO). Key performance metrics such as Total Energy Consumption (TEC), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput, Packet Loss, Cumulative Energy Consumption (CEC), and Residual Energy (RE) were analyzed to identify protocol-specific strengths and weaknesses. The simulation results reveal significant differences in protocol performance, with FPA demonstrating superior energy efficiency and network reliability, achieving improvements of up to 30% in TEC, 35% in throughput, 7% in PDR, 12% in packet loss, 20% in CEC, and 25% in RE compared to other protocols. These findings provide valuable insights into the trade-offs associated with clustering protocols, aiding in the selection of the most suitable methodology for specific WSN applications. The research work advances the understanding of clustering protocols by presenting a data-driven comparative analysis that evaluates their fitness for energy-constrained scenarios. The study contributes to optimizing protocol selection for enhanced network lifetime and performance, paving the way for more efficient WSN deployments.

Engineering Research ExpressVol. 7(1)
Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (IN), Guru Nanak Dev University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
13.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.