Leadership development in the cross-cultural context of China: Who really cares?

We address the challenges of developing Chinese leaders in multinational companies (MNCs) from the perspective of the leaders themselves. We focus on the consequences of perceptual differences across cultures. Based on interviews with Chinese high-potential managers (HPMs), we find that differing perceptions of care and leadership impact the perceived quality of global talent management (GTM) and work practices. We conclude that from a Chinese perspective western MNCs are relatively effective in human capital and leader development, but weaker in terms of attention to social capital and leader ship . We make recommendations for how Chinese managers in MNCs might be more effectively developed into global leadership roles. • We problematise the notion of leadership care in a cross-cultural context and extended the theory of problematisation. • We analyse leadership development in China through ‘human-' vs. social capital’, and 'leader-' vs.‘leadership development’. • Differing cultural perceptions of care and leadership shape global talent management and work practices in MNCs in China. • Our model shows western MNC leaders foster human capital well, but struggle with social capital as per Chinese norms. • We advise on leadership, relationships, and cultureto help Chinese MNC managers transition into global leadership roles. • We extend the theory of problematisation to include the concept of 'found problematisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Business Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102400
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human Resource and Talent Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership development in the cross-cultural context of China: Who really cares?

Keith Goodall, Daniel Agerbech Petersen
5 citations
International Business Review
Human Resource and Talent Management
13.82
article

Leadership development in the cross-cultural context of China: Who really cares?

Keith Goodall, Daniel Agerbech Petersen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We address the challenges of developing Chinese leaders in multinational companies (MNCs) from the perspective of the leaders themselves. We focus on the consequences of perceptual differences across cultures. Based on interviews with Chinese high-potential managers (HPMs), we find that differing perceptions of care and leadership impact the perceived quality of global talent management (GTM) and work practices. We conclude that from a Chinese perspective western MNCs are relatively effective in human capital and leader development, but weaker in terms of attention to social capital and leader ship . We make recommendations for how Chinese managers in MNCs might be more effectively developed into global leadership roles. • We problematise the notion of leadership care in a cross-cultural context and extended the theory of problematisation. • We analyse leadership development in China through ‘human-' vs. social capital’, and 'leader-' vs.‘leadership development’. • Differing cultural perceptions of care and leadership shape global talent management and work practices in MNCs in China. • Our model shows western MNC leaders foster human capital well, but struggle with social capital as per Chinese norms. • We advise on leadership, relationships, and cultureto help Chinese MNC managers transition into global leadership roles. • We extend the theory of problematisation to include the concept of 'found problematisation.

International Business ReviewVol. 34(3)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Human Resource and Talent Management
13.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.