Effect of DNA extraction method in gut fungal community assessment

Understanding the gut mycobiota composition and its impact on health requires reliable methods for fungal community assessment. This study explores the influence of DNA extraction methods in GM analysis. Three protocols were evaluated: Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with mechanical glass bead lysis (DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax Microbiome ultra-nucleic isolation kit automated method (MM), and MM combined with glass beads lysis (MMgb). Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were collected, DNA extracted and ITS2 amplicon library preparation and sequencing performed. Results showed that DNA yields did not significantly differ among methods and the addition of glass bead beating favored the recovery of DNA more appropriate for fungal analysis. Beta diversity revealed distinct clusters, with MMgb showing the most pronounced variation in mycobiota composition, exposing particularly the low abundance taxa. LEfSe analysis identified significant differences in the abundance of fungal species among the extraction methods. Samples extracted with bead beating were enriched in filamentous species, while those without this step showed higher relative abundance of yeast fungi. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods for accurate characterization of the gut mycobiota, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in microbial data acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Argentina de Microbiología
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2024.12.005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of DNA extraction method in gut fungal community assessment

Verónica L. Burstein, Néstor D. Portela, Laura S. Chiapello, Cristian Mena et al.
1 citations
Revista Argentina de Microbiología
Gut microbiota and health
0.81
article

Effect of DNA extraction method in gut fungal community assessment

Verónica L. Burstein, Néstor D. Portela, Laura S. Chiapello, Cristian Mena, M. Martín, Susana Pesoa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding the gut mycobiota composition and its impact on health requires reliable methods for fungal community assessment. This study explores the influence of DNA extraction methods in GM analysis. Three protocols were evaluated: Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with mechanical glass bead lysis (DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax Microbiome ultra-nucleic isolation kit automated method (MM), and MM combined with glass beads lysis (MMgb). Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were collected, DNA extracted and ITS2 amplicon library preparation and sequencing performed. Results showed that DNA yields did not significantly differ among methods and the addition of glass bead beating favored the recovery of DNA more appropriate for fungal analysis. Beta diversity revealed distinct clusters, with MMgb showing the most pronounced variation in mycobiota composition, exposing particularly the low abundance taxa. LEfSe analysis identified significant differences in the abundance of fungal species among the extraction methods. Samples extracted with bead beating were enriched in filamentous species, while those without this step showed higher relative abundance of yeast fungi. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods for accurate characterization of the gut mycobiota, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in microbial data acquisition.

Revista Argentina de MicrobiologíaVol. 57(4)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), Research Centre in Biological Chemistry of Córdoba (AR), Instituto Universitario Aeronáutico (AR), Instituto de Investigación Médica Mercedes y Martín Ferreyra (AR)
Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gut microbiota and health
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.