Public sector corruption in South Asia: focusing on institutional factors with a two-step fsQCA

While the influence of institutions on public sector corruption is widely recognised, empirical exploration of their specific effects remains limited. Using a two-step fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this paper identifies several causal combinations of political and economic institutions that contribute to higher levels of public sector corruption in South Asia. Based on these findings, we recommend strengthening e-governance to streamline administrative processes, thereby reinforcing the corruption-reducing effects of parliamentarism, which may otherwise be distorted by factors such as excessive bureaucracy in the region. Additionally, we emphasise the need for South Asian policymakers to enhance external audits and integrity assessments by independent agencies while prioritising the improvement of democratic governance as a key strategy for effectively addressing corruption in the public sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04477-9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public sector corruption in South Asia: focusing on institutional factors with a two-step fsQCA

Jinwon Han, Chanwahn Kim
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corruption and Economic Development
16.81
article

Public sector corruption in South Asia: focusing on institutional factors with a two-step fsQCA

Jinwon Han, Chanwahn Kim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

While the influence of institutions on public sector corruption is widely recognised, empirical exploration of their specific effects remains limited. Using a two-step fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this paper identifies several causal combinations of political and economic institutions that contribute to higher levels of public sector corruption in South Asia. Based on these findings, we recommend strengthening e-governance to streamline administrative processes, thereby reinforcing the corruption-reducing effects of parliamentarism, which may otherwise be distorted by factors such as excessive bureaucracy in the region. Additionally, we emphasise the need for South Asian policymakers to enhance external audits and integrity assessments by independent agencies while prioritising the improvement of democratic governance as a key strategy for effectively addressing corruption in the public sector.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corruption and Economic Development
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.