Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success

Evidence abounds that passive strategies such as rereading or highlighting are less effective than active strategies such as drawing models or explaining concepts to others. However, many studies have also reported that students tend to use learning strategies that they perceive as comfortable and easy, even when other strategies may be more successful. In this study, we asked students to self-report their study strategies after test-taking, as well as any planned new strategies. We also compared their self-reports with their actual use of the technique of self-testing, which was defined as completing practice problems in their online courseware system. In contrast to prior studies, students reported using self-testing more than any other strategy, and the amount of self-testing they used predicted their final performance in the course. Students' continued reporting of intended new strategies also correlated with performance, as did the accuracy of their reports of self-testing. These findings demonstrate that the amount of self-testing affects performance, and that students' accurate reporting of self-testing could be an indicator of their awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-04-0128
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success

Zachary S. Hazlett, P. Citlally Jimenez, Jenny Knight
3 citations
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
10.33
article

Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success

Zachary S. Hazlett, P. Citlally Jimenez, Jenny Knight
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evidence abounds that passive strategies such as rereading or highlighting are less effective than active strategies such as drawing models or explaining concepts to others. However, many studies have also reported that students tend to use learning strategies that they perceive as comfortable and easy, even when other strategies may be more successful. In this study, we asked students to self-report their study strategies after test-taking, as well as any planned new strategies. We also compared their self-reports with their actual use of the technique of self-testing, which was defined as completing practice problems in their online courseware system. In contrast to prior studies, students reported using self-testing more than any other strategy, and the amount of self-testing they used predicted their final performance in the course. Students' continued reporting of intended new strategies also correlated with performance, as did the accuracy of their reports of self-testing. These findings demonstrate that the amount of self-testing affects performance, and that students' accurate reporting of self-testing could be an indicator of their awareness.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 24(1)
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
10.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success — Zachary S. Hazlett, P. Citlally Jimenez, et al. · CBE—Life Sciences Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS