Let Us Not Speak of Them, But Look and Pass? Organizational Responses to Online Reviews

In a world where five stars have become the standard for evaluating many transactions and consumers turn to the crowd for guidance when making a wide variety of choices, organizations cannot dismiss online reviews as inconsequential. And whereas we know a lot about how organizations respond to reviews online, there has been a lack of systematic evidence showing how organizations behave in response to online feedback once their screens are turned off. This paper leverages a novel combination of insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment, an archival study, and two rounds of qualitative interviews in the French restaurant industry to examine online and offline responses to reviewer feedback. We identify characteristics of the review, the restaurant, and the respondent that influenced when restaurants in our sample were more likely to align their actions online and offline and when they were more likely to decouple them—that is, posting an online response promising to take corrective action while having no intention to change how the restaurant operates “in real life.” We conclude by speculating on potential mechanisms behind our respondents’ reactions and discussing our contribution to the literature on producer reactivity and the symbolic management of change. Funding: This work was supported by Università Bocconi, Labex Ecodec, and Fondation HEC. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14091 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Science
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14091
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Let Us Not Speak of Them, But Look and Pass? Organizational Responses to Online Reviews

Saverio Dave Favaron, Giada Di Stefano
2 citations
Organization Science
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
7.73
article

Let Us Not Speak of Them, But Look and Pass? Organizational Responses to Online Reviews

Saverio Dave Favaron, Giada Di Stefano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In a world where five stars have become the standard for evaluating many transactions and consumers turn to the crowd for guidance when making a wide variety of choices, organizations cannot dismiss online reviews as inconsequential. And whereas we know a lot about how organizations respond to reviews online, there has been a lack of systematic evidence showing how organizations behave in response to online feedback once their screens are turned off. This paper leverages a novel combination of insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment, an archival study, and two rounds of qualitative interviews in the French restaurant industry to examine online and offline responses to reviewer feedback. We identify characteristics of the review, the restaurant, and the respondent that influenced when restaurants in our sample were more likely to align their actions online and offline and when they were more likely to decouple them—that is, posting an online response promising to take corrective action while having no intention to change how the restaurant operates “in real life.” We conclude by speculating on potential mechanisms behind our respondents’ reactions and discussing our contribution to the literature on producer reactivity and the symbolic management of change. Funding: This work was supported by Università Bocconi, Labex Ecodec, and Fondation HEC. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14091 .

Organization ScienceVol. 36(2)
SKEMA Business School (FR), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion (FR), Bocconi University (IT), HEC Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.