Ecological data reveal imbalances in human–human collision avoidance due to dyads' social interaction

Humans navigate public spaces safely and smoothly using complex collision avoidance strategies. Traditional models of human–human collision avoidance often draw from physics, relying on repulsive forces, but the effect of social factors on these strategies is not well understood. This study examines frontal encounters between single pedestrians and two-person groups (dyads), investigating the contributions of each party to collision avoidance and the impact of social interaction within the group. Using an ecological dataset of pedestrian trajectories, we measured deviations from a straight path as a proxy for collision avoidance. Our findings reveal a systematic imbalance and significant effects of social interaction on collision avoidance. Single pedestrians tend to prioritise trajectory efficiency in undisturbed situations and are the primary contributors to avoidance during encounters, adjusting their paths according to the dyad's interaction level. For dyads, social interaction correlates with lower efficiency in undisturbed cases and reduced responsiveness during encounters. An analysis of the impact parameter further shows that collision risk influences path deviations: individuals demonstrate larger deviations in response to highly interactive dyads, both in high-risk and less critical encounters. For dyads, the difference in deviation between low and high interaction levels is most pronounced when the single pedestrian is on a near-collision course. These results deepen our understanding of human pedestrian navigation, illustrating dynamical and social implications of group dynamics. • Single pedestrians are the primary contributors to collision avoidance during encounters. • Single pedestrians adjust their path deviations based on the interaction level of the dyads. • Dyads engaged in social interaction show reduced responsiveness in collision avoidance. • Significant behavioural differences in deviation occur based on collision risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.039
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological data reveal imbalances in human–human collision avoidance due to dyads' social interaction

Takayuki Kanda, Zeynep Yücel, Adrien Gregorj, Francesco Zanlungo
3 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
3.44
article

Ecological data reveal imbalances in human–human collision avoidance due to dyads' social interaction

Takayuki Kanda, Zeynep Yücel, Adrien Gregorj, Francesco Zanlungo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Humans navigate public spaces safely and smoothly using complex collision avoidance strategies. Traditional models of human–human collision avoidance often draw from physics, relying on repulsive forces, but the effect of social factors on these strategies is not well understood. This study examines frontal encounters between single pedestrians and two-person groups (dyads), investigating the contributions of each party to collision avoidance and the impact of social interaction within the group. Using an ecological dataset of pedestrian trajectories, we measured deviations from a straight path as a proxy for collision avoidance. Our findings reveal a systematic imbalance and significant effects of social interaction on collision avoidance. Single pedestrians tend to prioritise trajectory efficiency in undisturbed situations and are the primary contributors to avoidance during encounters, adjusting their paths according to the dyad's interaction level. For dyads, social interaction correlates with lower efficiency in undisturbed cases and reduced responsiveness during encounters. An analysis of the impact parameter further shows that collision risk influences path deviations: individuals demonstrate larger deviations in response to highly interactive dyads, both in high-risk and less critical encounters. For dyads, the difference in deviation between low and high interaction levels is most pronounced when the single pedestrian is on a near-collision course. These results deepen our understanding of human pedestrian navigation, illustrating dynamical and social implications of group dynamics. • Single pedestrians are the primary contributors to collision avoidance during encounters. • Single pedestrians adjust their path deviations based on the interaction level of the dyads. • Dyads engaged in social interaction show reduced responsiveness in collision avoidance. • Significant behavioural differences in deviation occur based on collision risk.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 109
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Okayama University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP), Osaka International University (JP), University of Palermo (IT)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Moonshot Research and Development Program
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.