Spatial deep convolutional neural networks

Spatial prediction problems often use Gaussian process models, which can be computationally burdensome in high dimensions. Specification of an appropriate covariance function for the model can be challenging when complex non-stationarities exist. Recent work has shown that pre-computed spatial basis functions and a feed-forward neural network can capture complex spatial dependence structures while remaining computationally efficient. This paper builds on this literature by tailoring spatial basis functions for use in convolutional neural networks. Through both simulated and real data, we demonstrate that this approach yields more accurate spatial predictions than existing methods. Uncertainty quantification is also considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial Statistics
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2025.100883
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial deep convolutional neural networks

Robert Lund, Paul A. Parker, Qi Wang
10 citations
Spatial Statistics
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
7.99
article

Spatial deep convolutional neural networks

Robert Lund, Paul A. Parker, Qi Wang
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Spatial prediction problems often use Gaussian process models, which can be computationally burdensome in high dimensions. Specification of an appropriate covariance function for the model can be challenging when complex non-stationarities exist. Recent work has shown that pre-computed spatial basis functions and a feed-forward neural network can capture complex spatial dependence structures while remaining computationally efficient. This paper builds on this literature by tailoring spatial basis functions for use in convolutional neural networks. Through both simulated and real data, we demonstrate that this approach yields more accurate spatial predictions than existing methods. Uncertainty quantification is also considered.

Spatial StatisticsVol. 66
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
7.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.