Fatal Health Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques with Cardiotocography Dataset

Pregnant women's health is crucial, and any issues or unpleasant circumstances that develop during pregnancy can have a major impact on the mother and the developing fetus. In order to predict fetal health outcomes using Cardiotocography (CTG) data, this research study examines the use of machine learning methods, such as SVC, a Random Forest the Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression. Evaluation of these algorithms' performance in terms of F1 score, recall, accuracy, and precision is the goal of the study. According to the results, Random Forest had the highest accuracy (95%), followed by Decision Tree (91.6%), SVC (90.6%), and Logistic Regression (89%). In addition, Random Forest had the best F1 score, recall, and precision—94.8%, 94.7%, and 94.8%, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incowoco64194.2024.10863154
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fatal Health Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques with Cardiotocography Dataset

Leema Nelson, Shikha Prasher, Deepak Arumugam
3 citations
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.55
article

Fatal Health Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques with Cardiotocography Dataset

Leema Nelson, Shikha Prasher, Deepak Arumugam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Pregnant women's health is crucial, and any issues or unpleasant circumstances that develop during pregnancy can have a major impact on the mother and the developing fetus. In order to predict fetal health outcomes using Cardiotocography (CTG) data, this research study examines the use of machine learning methods, such as SVC, a Random Forest the Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression. Evaluation of these algorithms' performance in terms of F1 score, recall, accuracy, and precision is the goal of the study. According to the results, Random Forest had the highest accuracy (95%), followed by Decision Tree (91.6%), SVC (90.6%), and Logistic Regression (89%). In addition, Random Forest had the best F1 score, recall, and precision—94.8%, 94.7%, and 94.8%, respectively.

Chitkara University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fatal Health Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques with Cardiotocography Dataset — Leema Nelson, Shikha Prasher, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS