Synergistic CNN-Random Forest Model for Signature Recognition and Classification

The abstract performance characteristics of a signature classifying hypothesis, including precision, recall, F1-Score, encouragement, support percentage, and accuracy for two different signature classification levels. To take a Signature Classification stage one, the proposed approach achieves remarkable accuracy, recall, and F1-Score ratings of 99.87%, 99.50%, & 99.68%, accordingly. These metrics show how amazingly well the algorithm can classify situations in this category. The robustness of the model is demonstrated by the support column, which has 4020 instances classified as Signature Classification Stage 1. With a significant value of 0.47, the support percentage indicates the class's contribution to the entire dataset. In a similar vein, Signature Classification Stage 2 exhibits excellent performance characteristics, with 99.77 percent accuracy, recall, and F1-Score. There is a greater support rate in this class since 4510 instances give 0.52 to the total dataset. The model demonstrates its ability to identify signals with a stunning 99.64% Small Average accuracy, which is the average precision over all cases. Both signature levels performed in balance, as indicated by the weighted average & macro average metrics, which are predicted to be 99.73% for F1-Score, 99.82% for accuracy, & 99.64% for recall. This demonstrates how the model succeeds in maintaining a high level of accuracy throughout the entire dataset in addition to predicting specific classes. With a 99.6483% overall accuracy, it is shown that the notion of signature classification helps classify signatures at different levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/gccit63234.2024.10862785
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic CNN-Random Forest Model for Signature Recognition and Classification

Rajesh Sharma R, Vikrant Sharma, Akey Sungheetha, G S Pradeep Ghantasala et al.
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
article

Synergistic CNN-Random Forest Model for Signature Recognition and Classification

Rajesh Sharma R, Vikrant Sharma, Akey Sungheetha, G S Pradeep Ghantasala, Anuj Kumar Jain, Gaganpreet Kaur
article en

Abstract

The abstract performance characteristics of a signature classifying hypothesis, including precision, recall, F1-Score, encouragement, support percentage, and accuracy for two different signature classification levels. To take a Signature Classification stage one, the proposed approach achieves remarkable accuracy, recall, and F1-Score ratings of 99.87%, 99.50%, & 99.68%, accordingly. These metrics show how amazingly well the algorithm can classify situations in this category. The robustness of the model is demonstrated by the support column, which has 4020 instances classified as Signature Classification Stage 1. With a significant value of 0.47, the support percentage indicates the class's contribution to the entire dataset. In a similar vein, Signature Classification Stage 2 exhibits excellent performance characteristics, with 99.77 percent accuracy, recall, and F1-Score. There is a greater support rate in this class since 4510 instances give 0.52 to the total dataset. The model demonstrates its ability to identify signals with a stunning 99.64% Small Average accuracy, which is the average precision over all cases. Both signature levels performed in balance, as indicated by the weighted average & macro average metrics, which are predicted to be 99.73% for F1-Score, 99.82% for accuracy, & 99.64% for recall. This demonstrates how the model succeeds in maintaining a high level of accuracy throughout the entire dataset in addition to predicting specific classes. With a 99.6483% overall accuracy, it is shown that the notion of signature classification helps classify signatures at different levels.

Chandigarh University (IN), Alliance University (IN), Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.