Catalyzing “Cohortness” in Leadership Programs Pivoting to a Virtual Environment

Leadership training commonly brings individuals or teams together in face-to-face settings to network and build their skills in groups referred to as “cohorts.” The pandemic of 2020 forced leadership training programs to be held virtually, bringing into question how programs could foster a sense of “cohortness,” or a collegial sense of group identity, even when the participants could not meet face-to-face. For this study, two programs, the Clinical Scholars (CS) program (n = 34), and the Food Systems Leadership Institute (FSLI) (n = 23), collaborated to explore how participants expecting an in-person program responded to adaptations made for a virtual launch of their program and how connected they felt to their fellow classmates. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data showed that prior to attending each program, fewer than half of participants expected to feel slightly to very connected as a cohort. At program completion, 96% reported feeling slightly to very connected. Both CS and FSLI participants ranked 1) Frequent small group exercises, 2) small group ice breakers, 3) Team introductions prior to the retreat 4) Virtual orientation as the top activities contributing to their sense of being a cohort. Although the pandemic will pass, the insights gained from examining how to foster professional networks and a collegial sense of group identity (“cohortness”) among virtually convened participants can benefit leadership development programs that must continue to meet virtually for financial or other reasons and can benefit those programs, which eventually resume in-person convenings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/6zv7-6779
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalyzing “Cohortness” in Leadership Programs Pivoting to a Virtual Environment

Lia Garman, Cheryl C. Noble, Suzanne E. Singer, Katherine Donnald et al.
UNC Libraries
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

Catalyzing “Cohortness” in Leadership Programs Pivoting to a Virtual Environment

Lia Garman, Cheryl C. Noble, Suzanne E. Singer, Katherine Donnald, Giselle Corbie, Gaurav Dave, Claudia S. P. Fernandez
article en

Abstract

Leadership training commonly brings individuals or teams together in face-to-face settings to network and build their skills in groups referred to as “cohorts.” The pandemic of 2020 forced leadership training programs to be held virtually, bringing into question how programs could foster a sense of “cohortness,” or a collegial sense of group identity, even when the participants could not meet face-to-face. For this study, two programs, the Clinical Scholars (CS) program (n = 34), and the Food Systems Leadership Institute (FSLI) (n = 23), collaborated to explore how participants expecting an in-person program responded to adaptations made for a virtual launch of their program and how connected they felt to their fellow classmates. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data showed that prior to attending each program, fewer than half of participants expected to feel slightly to very connected as a cohort. At program completion, 96% reported feeling slightly to very connected. Both CS and FSLI participants ranked 1) Frequent small group exercises, 2) small group ice breakers, 3) Team introductions prior to the retreat 4) Virtual orientation as the top activities contributing to their sense of being a cohort. Although the pandemic will pass, the insights gained from examining how to foster professional networks and a collegial sense of group identity (“cohortness”) among virtually convened participants can benefit leadership development programs that must continue to meet virtually for financial or other reasons and can benefit those programs, which eventually resume in-person convenings.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.