Analysis of square pattern spray nozzles for use in a portable field rainfall simulator

• Detailed comparison of six nozzles to guide nozzle selection for rainfall simulators. • Static square spray pattern nozzles can produce highly uniform simulated rain. • FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle achieved a Uniformity Coefficient of 87.42 ± 3.76 % at 40 kPa. • Disdrometer acoustically measured rain drop size distribution. Rainfall simulators have become essential tools for examining the impact of rainfall on hydrological processes. This study evaluates square pattern spray nozzles for a portable field rainfall simulator and details the design of a trailer-based simulator for field-scale plot studies. Full cone, square-pattern spray nozzles produced a well-distributed spray pattern, eliminating the need for nozzle oscillation, reducing system variables, and enhancing reproducibility. The detailed study was conducted involving five square pattern nozzles alongside the commonly used VeeJet 80100 nozzle, where the spatial distribution, drop size distribution, and kinetic energy of each nozzle at varying pressures were analysed. Spatial distribution of simulated rainfall was investigated using a 10 x 10 grid of collection containers with 20 cm spacing. The FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle achieved a Christiansen’s Uniformity Coefficient of 87.42 ± 3.76 % at 40 kPa, notable for its lack of a high-intensity central spray zone, making it suitable for rainfall simulation studies. Drop size distribution was assessed with a RainFlow RF4 Disdrometer, acoustically measuring rainfall drop size at each grid point for a spatially averaged distribution. Lower pressures (40 kPa) were associated with larger drop sizes, and the FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle had drop size distribution similar to comparative nozzles. Kinetic energy was empirically calculated at varying pressures using intensity-based prediction equations and was found to be comparable to published literature. Overall, the portable simulator utilising the FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle was ideal for simulating all but the most intense rainfall events, with an intensity of approximately 100 mm/hr.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108796
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of square pattern spray nozzles for use in a portable field rainfall simulator

Prasanna Egodawatta, Marc Miska, Lucy Reading, Matthew Tiller
5 citations
CATENA
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
6.50
article

Analysis of square pattern spray nozzles for use in a portable field rainfall simulator

Prasanna Egodawatta, Marc Miska, Lucy Reading, Matthew Tiller
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Detailed comparison of six nozzles to guide nozzle selection for rainfall simulators. • Static square spray pattern nozzles can produce highly uniform simulated rain. • FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle achieved a Uniformity Coefficient of 87.42 ± 3.76 % at 40 kPa. • Disdrometer acoustically measured rain drop size distribution. Rainfall simulators have become essential tools for examining the impact of rainfall on hydrological processes. This study evaluates square pattern spray nozzles for a portable field rainfall simulator and details the design of a trailer-based simulator for field-scale plot studies. Full cone, square-pattern spray nozzles produced a well-distributed spray pattern, eliminating the need for nozzle oscillation, reducing system variables, and enhancing reproducibility. The detailed study was conducted involving five square pattern nozzles alongside the commonly used VeeJet 80100 nozzle, where the spatial distribution, drop size distribution, and kinetic energy of each nozzle at varying pressures were analysed. Spatial distribution of simulated rainfall was investigated using a 10 x 10 grid of collection containers with 20 cm spacing. The FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle achieved a Christiansen’s Uniformity Coefficient of 87.42 ± 3.76 % at 40 kPa, notable for its lack of a high-intensity central spray zone, making it suitable for rainfall simulation studies. Drop size distribution was assessed with a RainFlow RF4 Disdrometer, acoustically measuring rainfall drop size at each grid point for a spatially averaged distribution. Lower pressures (40 kPa) were associated with larger drop sizes, and the FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle had drop size distribution similar to comparative nozzles. Kinetic energy was empirically calculated at varying pressures using intensity-based prediction equations and was found to be comparable to published literature. Overall, the portable simulator utilising the FullJet 14.5SQ nozzle was ideal for simulating all but the most intense rainfall events, with an intensity of approximately 100 mm/hr.

CATENAVol. 250
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.