Tackling impurities in CCS pipelines: An optimization-based approach

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is crucial for carbon neutrality, requiring efficient CO 2 transport through pipelines. This study introduces an efficient optimization-based model for designing cost-optimal pipelines with a compressor-pump assembly and intermediate boosters, considering impurities such as Argon, Methane, hydrogen and Nitrogen, which impact stream density, pressure drop, and levelized transport costs (LCOCT). Impurities reduce throughput by 3.6 % and increase compression energy by 11 % (from 100.11 to 111.14 kWh/ton CO₂), accounting for 30 % of CCS equivalent energy. A penalty scheme (e.g., US'84/ton CO₂ for 4 % N₂) offsets impurity costs, highlighting the need for impurity control in efficient CCS deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101142
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling impurities in CCS pipelines: An optimization-based approach

Ahmed AlHajaj, Mohamed Mazhar Laljee
5 citations
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
3.37
article

Tackling impurities in CCS pipelines: An optimization-based approach

Ahmed AlHajaj, Mohamed Mazhar Laljee
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is crucial for carbon neutrality, requiring efficient CO 2 transport through pipelines. This study introduces an efficient optimization-based model for designing cost-optimal pipelines with a compressor-pump assembly and intermediate boosters, considering impurities such as Argon, Methane, hydrogen and Nitrogen, which impact stream density, pressure drop, and levelized transport costs (LCOCT). Impurities reduce throughput by 3.6 % and increase compression energy by 11 % (from 100.11 to 111.14 kWh/ton CO₂), accounting for 30 % of CCS equivalent energy. A penalty scheme (e.g., US'84/ton CO₂ for 4 % N₂) offsets impurity costs, highlighting the need for impurity control in efficient CCS deployment.

Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental EngineeringVol. 11
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar (IN)
Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.