Modeling Determinants of Autonomous Vehicle Utilization in Private and Shared Ownership Models

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) and shared mobility constitute two of the “Three Revolutions” that portend major changes to surface transportation. AVs promise to reduce accidents, expand accessibility, and decrease congestion, while shared mobility provides the benefits of automotive transportation without requiring the purchase of a vehicle or the ability to drive it. Despite great promise to alleviate the negative externalities imposed by transportation, there remains much to be understood about the combined diffusion and impact of AVs and shared mobility. There is little demonstrated experience and application of AVs to the public, and how and where people would use automated shared mobility relative to their current travel is largely unknown. This study advances our understanding by utilizing an intercept survey of 232 respondents in Ann Arbor, Michigan who had made a discretionary trip to one of two central and two suburban locations. The novel approach of using intercept surveys allows us to gather more valid data about the willingness of respondents to replace the mode they just used for either a privately owned or a shared AV and do so for the trip purpose most conducive to using such a vehicle. We incorporate descriptive and spatial analyses and then utilize multinomial logit models to predict the factors influencing the encouragement or discouragement of substituting a private and a shared AV for their previous trip. We found that active mobility and transit trips work in competition with private AVs, while youth encourages interest. Meanwhile, active mobility, increasing age, and one of our measures of density discourage interest, while female respondents and the same measure of density increase interest. The results suggest that future efforts to facilitate the adoption of shared AVs target areas of the city that are relatively dense and residents in these areas where a shared AV would enhance individuals’ mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Transportation
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5010018
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Determinants of Autonomous Vehicle Utilization in Private and Shared Ownership Models

Scott Kelley, Bradley W. Lane
Future Transportation
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Modeling Determinants of Autonomous Vehicle Utilization in Private and Shared Ownership Models

Scott Kelley, Bradley W. Lane
article en

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) and shared mobility constitute two of the “Three Revolutions” that portend major changes to surface transportation. AVs promise to reduce accidents, expand accessibility, and decrease congestion, while shared mobility provides the benefits of automotive transportation without requiring the purchase of a vehicle or the ability to drive it. Despite great promise to alleviate the negative externalities imposed by transportation, there remains much to be understood about the combined diffusion and impact of AVs and shared mobility. There is little demonstrated experience and application of AVs to the public, and how and where people would use automated shared mobility relative to their current travel is largely unknown. This study advances our understanding by utilizing an intercept survey of 232 respondents in Ann Arbor, Michigan who had made a discretionary trip to one of two central and two suburban locations. The novel approach of using intercept surveys allows us to gather more valid data about the willingness of respondents to replace the mode they just used for either a privately owned or a shared AV and do so for the trip purpose most conducive to using such a vehicle. We incorporate descriptive and spatial analyses and then utilize multinomial logit models to predict the factors influencing the encouragement or discouragement of substituting a private and a shared AV for their previous trip. We found that active mobility and transit trips work in competition with private AVs, while youth encourages interest. Meanwhile, active mobility, increasing age, and one of our measures of density discourage interest, while female respondents and the same measure of density increase interest. The results suggest that future efforts to facilitate the adoption of shared AVs target areas of the city that are relatively dense and residents in these areas where a shared AV would enhance individuals’ mobility.

Future TransportationVol. 5(1)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Kansas (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Institute, University of Michigan
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.