Evaluating the Trade-Off Between Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving in Spray Drying Operations

In this study, modelling simulations were employed to analyze the effects of inlet drying air flow rate and temperature, product feed rate, and heat recovery ratio in a spray dryer. The energy efficiency, energy savings, and final product outlet temperature were investigated. As the heat recovery ratio (by-pass ratio) increased, total energy savings improved, though energy efficiency declined at a slower rate compared to energy savings. The modelling study, conducted with five different by-pass ratios (100%, 70%, 50%, 30%, and 0%), indicated that the optimal by-pass ratio was 30%. At this ratio, energy efficiency decreased by 5%, while energy savings increased by approximately 16%. Additionally, at higher by-pass ratios, the product outlet temperature rose significantly. To maintain product quality, it was found that the maximum acceptable temperature of 60°C could be achieved at by-pass ratios of 40% or lower.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C Tasarım ve Teknoloji
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1562960
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Trade-Off Between Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving in Spray Drying Operations

Gülşah Karaca Dolgun
Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C Tasarım ve Teknoloji
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

Evaluating the Trade-Off Between Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving in Spray Drying Operations

Gülşah Karaca Dolgun
article en

Abstract

In this study, modelling simulations were employed to analyze the effects of inlet drying air flow rate and temperature, product feed rate, and heat recovery ratio in a spray dryer. The energy efficiency, energy savings, and final product outlet temperature were investigated. As the heat recovery ratio (by-pass ratio) increased, total energy savings improved, though energy efficiency declined at a slower rate compared to energy savings. The modelling study, conducted with five different by-pass ratios (100%, 70%, 50%, 30%, and 0%), indicated that the optimal by-pass ratio was 30%. At this ratio, energy efficiency decreased by 5%, while energy savings increased by approximately 16%. Additionally, at higher by-pass ratios, the product outlet temperature rose significantly. To maintain product quality, it was found that the maximum acceptable temperature of 60°C could be achieved at by-pass ratios of 40% or lower.

Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C Tasarım ve TeknolojiVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.