Age-Dependent Bolus Settings: Insulin-to-Carbohydrate Ratios and Insulin Sensitivity Factors in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Conventional CSII in the DPV Registry

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Effective bolus settings for insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios (ICRs) and insulin sensitivity factors (ISFs) are crucial for glycemic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps. Standard calculation methods based on the total daily insulin dose (TDD) often fall short for children. This study examined insulin pump settings for ICR and ISF in pediatric patients, considering diurnal variation, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The goal was to provide data-driven recommendations for initial bolus settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed insulin pump settings in 7697 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes in the DPV registry (Diabetes Prospective Follow-up) from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Luxembourg. Patients aged 1 to <18 years, postremission (diabetes duration >1 year, insulin dose ≥0.5 IU/kg/d), with good metabolic control (HbA1c ≤7.5%), using insulin pumps with short-acting analog insulin in 2023, were included. Automated insulin delivery system users were excluded. Patients were grouped by age (<6, 6 to <12, 12 to <18 years), BMI percentiles (<P25, P25-75, >P75), and sex. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Older children required more insulin, with lower ICRs and ISFs. Insulin requirements peaked in the morning with the lowest ICR and ISF, with medians (interquartile ranges): <6 years: 11.2 g carbs/IU (9.1-14.0) and 1:150 mg/dL (70-228); 6 to <12 years: 8.7 g carbs/IU (7.0-10.7) and 1:90 (50-140); and 12 to <18 years: 6.1 g carbs/IU (5.0-7.7) and 1:50 (40-80). ISF was highest in the late evening in all age groups, while a higher BMI-SDS was associated with a lower ISF. Girls above 6 years had lower ICR but similar ISF to that of boys. The factor obtained by multiplying ISF and TDD was comparable in all age groups and BMI categories. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our real-world findings on CSII settings in a large cohort of children with sufficient metabolic control highlight the inadequacy of a single TDD-based calculation formula, as insulin requirements varied by age, time of day, sex, and BMI. These findings may serve as a reference for commonly used age-dependent parameters for clinicians in establishing initial CSII settings before individualized dose titration and optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0551
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age-Dependent Bolus Settings: Insulin-to-Carbohydrate Ratios and Insulin Sensitivity Factors in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Conventional CSII in the DPV Registry

Mareike Niemeyer, Claudia Boettcher, Reinhard W. Holl, S Kahleyss et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Age-Dependent Bolus Settings: Insulin-to-Carbohydrate Ratios and Insulin Sensitivity Factors in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Conventional CSII in the DPV Registry

Mareike Niemeyer, Claudia Boettcher, Reinhard W. Holl, S Kahleyss, Alena Welters, Sarah Julie Otto, Angela Galler, Christina Reinauer, Lara-Sophie Zehnder
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Effective bolus settings for insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios (ICRs) and insulin sensitivity factors (ISFs) are crucial for glycemic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps. Standard calculation methods based on the total daily insulin dose (TDD) often fall short for children. This study examined insulin pump settings for ICR and ISF in pediatric patients, considering diurnal variation, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The goal was to provide data-driven recommendations for initial bolus settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed insulin pump settings in 7697 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes in the DPV registry (Diabetes Prospective Follow-up) from Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Luxembourg. Patients aged 1 to <18 years, postremission (diabetes duration >1 year, insulin dose ≥0.5 IU/kg/d), with good metabolic control (HbA1c ≤7.5%), using insulin pumps with short-acting analog insulin in 2023, were included. Automated insulin delivery system users were excluded. Patients were grouped by age (<6, 6 to <12, 12 to <18 years), BMI percentiles (<P25, P25-75, >P75), and sex. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Older children required more insulin, with lower ICRs and ISFs. Insulin requirements peaked in the morning with the lowest ICR and ISF, with medians (interquartile ranges): <6 years: 11.2 g carbs/IU (9.1-14.0) and 1:150 mg/dL (70-228); 6 to <12 years: 8.7 g carbs/IU (7.0-10.7) and 1:90 (50-140); and 12 to <18 years: 6.1 g carbs/IU (5.0-7.7) and 1:50 (40-80). ISF was highest in the late evening in all age groups, while a higher BMI-SDS was associated with a lower ISF. Girls above 6 years had lower ICR but similar ISF to that of boys. The factor obtained by multiplying ISF and TDD was comparable in all age groups and BMI categories. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our real-world findings on CSII settings in a large cohort of children with sufficient metabolic control highlight the inadequacy of a single TDD-based calculation formula, as insulin requirements varied by age, time of day, sex, and BMI. These findings may serve as a reference for commonly used age-dependent parameters for clinicians in establishing initial CSII settings before individualized dose titration and optimization.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(6)
Universität Ulm (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (DE), Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE), Klinikum Darmstadt (DE), University Children’s Hospital Bern (CH), Hegau-Bodensee-Klinikum Singen (DE), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), German Center for Diabetes Research (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.