Evaluation of Pedestrian-Perceived Comfort on Urban Streets Using Multi-Source Data: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Urban street comfort is a crucial measure of street environmental quality. However, traditional evaluations primarily focus on physical elements, often neglecting pedestrian perceptions. In this study, considering five core evaluation dimensions—safety, mobility, aesthetics, perceptibility, and convenience—an innovative quantitative evaluation model is proposed to assess pedestrian-perceived comfort on urban streets by integrating physical environmental factors and subjective experiences. This analysis comprises two steps: evaluation indicator extraction and weight application. Indicators are extracted from multi-source data (street-view images, real-time traffic data, points of interest, and pedestrian surveys) using a deep learning method. A comprehensive weighting method combining entropy weight and the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the relative importance of each factor. This study focuses on Nanjing as a case study, and the results reveal significant variations across the five dimensions and their 11 secondary indicators. Street environment safety (0.143) is critical for street safety, while the degree of street traffic congestion (0.121) dominates street mobility. Street aesthetics is primarily influenced by building enclosure (0.105), and street convenience is strongly affected by the number of surrounding bus stops (0.260). Spatial analysis indicates higher comfort levels in urban centers due to well-developed infrastructure, whereas peripheral areas face challenges from inadequate facilities. Notably, areas around parks demonstrate elevated pedestrian-perceived comfort levels, highlighting the importance of green spaces. Overall, the proposed evaluation system provides new insights from the perspective of pedestrian experience and offers valuable guidance for urban planning and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020063
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Pedestrian-Perceived Comfort on Urban Streets Using Multi-Source Data: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Yi Huang, Yehua Sheng, Jiarui Qin, Fengyuan Zhang et al.
16 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Urban Green Space and Health
19.19
article

Evaluation of Pedestrian-Perceived Comfort on Urban Streets Using Multi-Source Data: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Yi Huang, Yehua Sheng, Jiarui Qin, Fengyuan Zhang, Kaixuan Zhang, Yizhe Feng
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Urban street comfort is a crucial measure of street environmental quality. However, traditional evaluations primarily focus on physical elements, often neglecting pedestrian perceptions. In this study, considering five core evaluation dimensions—safety, mobility, aesthetics, perceptibility, and convenience—an innovative quantitative evaluation model is proposed to assess pedestrian-perceived comfort on urban streets by integrating physical environmental factors and subjective experiences. This analysis comprises two steps: evaluation indicator extraction and weight application. Indicators are extracted from multi-source data (street-view images, real-time traffic data, points of interest, and pedestrian surveys) using a deep learning method. A comprehensive weighting method combining entropy weight and the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the relative importance of each factor. This study focuses on Nanjing as a case study, and the results reveal significant variations across the five dimensions and their 11 secondary indicators. Street environment safety (0.143) is critical for street safety, while the degree of street traffic congestion (0.121) dominates street mobility. Street aesthetics is primarily influenced by building enclosure (0.105), and street convenience is strongly affected by the number of surrounding bus stops (0.260). Spatial analysis indicates higher comfort levels in urban centers due to well-developed infrastructure, whereas peripheral areas face challenges from inadequate facilities. Notably, areas around parks demonstrate elevated pedestrian-perceived comfort levels, highlighting the importance of green spaces. Overall, the proposed evaluation system provides new insights from the perspective of pedestrian experience and offers valuable guidance for urban planning and policy.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(2)
Nanjing Normal University (CN), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Urban Green Space and Health
19.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.