Feature selection methods for Cox proportional hazards model. Comparative study for financial and medical survival data

This study compares Cox proportional hazards models across medical and financial datasets built using various feature selection techniques. In this analysis 8 feature selection techniques (3 variants of forward selection, 2 variants of a selection based on principal component analysis, selection based on random survival forest, best subset selection and a selection based on a LASSO regularization) were tested across 22 multidimensional datasets (2 financial and 22 medical). The resulting Cox models were compared based on a concordance index. The main hypothesis of this study stating that the LASSO regularization or the selection based on random survival forest method (generating good models for medical data) would yield similar performance on financial data, was hereby disproved. The forward Schwarz and best subset selection gave the best results for financial data, while LASSO and random survival forest proved to be the most efficient in medical setting, for each considered model size.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bank i Kredyt.
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9612
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feature selection methods for Cox proportional hazards model. Comparative study for financial and medical survival data

Wojciech Skwirz
Bank i Kredyt.
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Feature selection methods for Cox proportional hazards model. Comparative study for financial and medical survival data

Wojciech Skwirz
article en

Abstract

This study compares Cox proportional hazards models across medical and financial datasets built using various feature selection techniques. In this analysis 8 feature selection techniques (3 variants of forward selection, 2 variants of a selection based on principal component analysis, selection based on random survival forest, best subset selection and a selection based on a LASSO regularization) were tested across 22 multidimensional datasets (2 financial and 22 medical). The resulting Cox models were compared based on a concordance index. The main hypothesis of this study stating that the LASSO regularization or the selection based on random survival forest method (generating good models for medical data) would yield similar performance on financial data, was hereby disproved. The forward Schwarz and best subset selection gave the best results for financial data, while LASSO and random survival forest proved to be the most efficient in medical setting, for each considered model size.

Bank i Kredyt.Vol. Vol. 56(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.