Common Prescription Errors in Diabetes: Physician’s Perspective

Abstract Background: Managing diabetes requires precise medication regimens, particularly with insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). However, prescription errors are prevalent in diabetes care and pose significant risks to patient safety, potentially resulting in severe acute and chronic complications. Despite the preventable nature of these errors, they persist in clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved prescribing practices and multidisciplinary care. Objective: This study aims to identify common prescription errors and faults in diabetes care, based on the perspectives of physicians, to propose strategies for reducing such errors and enhancing patient safety. Methodology: A qualitative research approach was adopted, involving semistructured interviews with 20 physicians at a comprehensive diabetes center in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Participants, with over 20 years of clinical experience in diabetes care, shared their observations on prescription errors. The data were analyzed thematically using R software, and ethical guidelines were followed, including informed consent and confidentiality assurances. Results: Key themes identified include basic prescription practices, where OHAs were frequently prescribed, with insulin often reserved as a last-resort therapy, and GLP-1 analogs rarely prescribed. Prescription legibility issues were common, with illegible handwritten prescriptions lacking critical details. Prescribing issues such as overprescribing, misprescribing, and underprescribing were widely reported. Contraindications were frequently overlooked, with inappropriate prescriptions for patients with renal failure, older adults, and those with liver impairment. Incorrect dosing of insulin and metformin was identified due to inadequate adjustments or cumulative overdosing. Drug–drug interactions, including between GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitors, and thiazide diuretics with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors, were noted. Transitional prescription errors during care transitions were also highlighted, often linked to poor communication and discrepancies in medication lists. Conclusion: The study highlights critical challenges in diabetes prescription practices and emphasizes the need for personalized care plans, regular medication reviews, and technological integration to reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. Continuous medical education and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are essential for advancing safe and effective diabetes management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdt.ijdt_47_24
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Prescription Errors in Diabetes: Physician’s Perspective

Anjana Basanth, Krishnadev Jothydev
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Common Prescription Errors in Diabetes: Physician’s Perspective

Anjana Basanth, Krishnadev Jothydev
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Managing diabetes requires precise medication regimens, particularly with insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). However, prescription errors are prevalent in diabetes care and pose significant risks to patient safety, potentially resulting in severe acute and chronic complications. Despite the preventable nature of these errors, they persist in clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved prescribing practices and multidisciplinary care. Objective: This study aims to identify common prescription errors and faults in diabetes care, based on the perspectives of physicians, to propose strategies for reducing such errors and enhancing patient safety. Methodology: A qualitative research approach was adopted, involving semistructured interviews with 20 physicians at a comprehensive diabetes center in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Participants, with over 20 years of clinical experience in diabetes care, shared their observations on prescription errors. The data were analyzed thematically using R software, and ethical guidelines were followed, including informed consent and confidentiality assurances. Results: Key themes identified include basic prescription practices, where OHAs were frequently prescribed, with insulin often reserved as a last-resort therapy, and GLP-1 analogs rarely prescribed. Prescription legibility issues were common, with illegible handwritten prescriptions lacking critical details. Prescribing issues such as overprescribing, misprescribing, and underprescribing were widely reported. Contraindications were frequently overlooked, with inappropriate prescriptions for patients with renal failure, older adults, and those with liver impairment. Incorrect dosing of insulin and metformin was identified due to inadequate adjustments or cumulative overdosing. Drug–drug interactions, including between GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitors, and thiazide diuretics with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors, were noted. Transitional prescription errors during care transitions were also highlighted, often linked to poor communication and discrepancies in medication lists. Conclusion: The study highlights critical challenges in diabetes prescription practices and emphasizes the need for personalized care plans, regular medication reviews, and technological integration to reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. Continuous medical education and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are essential for advancing safe and effective diabetes management.

International Journal of Diabetes and TechnologyVol. 3(4)
Jothydev's Diabetes and Research Center (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.