Household Portfolios and Monetary Policy

ABSTRACT We show that expansionary monetary policy is positively (negatively) associated with household portfolio allocation to high‐risk (low‐risk) assets, in line with ‘reaching for yield’ behaviour. Our main findings are based on an analysis of US household‐level data using alternative measures of monetary policy shifts over the period 1999–2007. Using the two‐part Fractional Response Model, we show that changes in the Federal Funds Rate (FFR) have a stronger impact on the decision to hold high‐risk assets relative to the impact on the decision to hold low‐risk assets. In addition, our findings indicate that the impact of FFR changes is stronger for active investors. Finally, our findings are robust over an extended time period (1999–2019) that includes the global financial crisis using a monetary policy measure that accounts for the post‐crisis ZLB period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3125
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Household Portfolios and Monetary Policy

Raslan Alzuabi, Alexandros Kontonikas, Sarah Brown, Alberto Montagnoli
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Household Portfolios and Monetary Policy

Raslan Alzuabi, Alexandros Kontonikas, Sarah Brown, Alberto Montagnoli
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We show that expansionary monetary policy is positively (negatively) associated with household portfolio allocation to high‐risk (low‐risk) assets, in line with ‘reaching for yield’ behaviour. Our main findings are based on an analysis of US household‐level data using alternative measures of monetary policy shifts over the period 1999–2007. Using the two‐part Fractional Response Model, we show that changes in the Federal Funds Rate (FFR) have a stronger impact on the decision to hold high‐risk assets relative to the impact on the decision to hold low‐risk assets. In addition, our findings indicate that the impact of FFR changes is stronger for active investors. Finally, our findings are robust over an extended time period (1999–2019) that includes the global financial crisis using a monetary policy measure that accounts for the post‐crisis ZLB period.

International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol. 30(4)
University of Essex (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.