Microplastics in Antarctica - A plastic legacy in the Antarctic snow?

Microplastic pollution in remote inland Antarctica is largely unknown. This study explored the plastic footprint of snow from remote Antarctic camps: Union Glacier, Schanz Glacier and the South Pole. Refined automated FTIR techniques enabled interrogation of microplastics (including fibres) to a lower detection limit of 11 μm in Antarctic snow for the first time. Microplastics were pervasive (73-3099 MP L<sup>-1</sup>). The majority (95 %) measured <50 μm, indicating that previous microplastic reports in Antarctica may be underestimated, due to analytical restrictions. Plastic polymer composition and concentration did not vary significantly between sites, with dominant polymers being polyamide (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE) and synthetic rubber. Results indicate that even in the earth's most remote regions, humans are leaving a plastic legacy in the snow, illustrating the importance of remote, cryospheric regions as critical study sites for determining temporal fluxes in microplastic pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178543
Citations
36
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microplastics in Antarctica - A plastic legacy in the Antarctic snow?

Emily Rowlands, Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway, Claire M. Waluda et al.
36 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
18.13
article

Microplastics in Antarctica - A plastic legacy in the Antarctic snow?

Emily Rowlands, Clara Manno, Tamara S. Galloway, Claire M. Waluda, Sebastian Primpke, Matthew Cole, Kirstie Jones-Williams
article en
36 citations

Abstract

Microplastic pollution in remote inland Antarctica is largely unknown. This study explored the plastic footprint of snow from remote Antarctic camps: Union Glacier, Schanz Glacier and the South Pole. Refined automated FTIR techniques enabled interrogation of microplastics (including fibres) to a lower detection limit of 11 μm in Antarctic snow for the first time. Microplastics were pervasive (73-3099 MP L<sup>-1</sup>). The majority (95 %) measured <50 μm, indicating that previous microplastic reports in Antarctica may be underestimated, due to analytical restrictions. Plastic polymer composition and concentration did not vary significantly between sites, with dominant polymers being polyamide (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE) and synthetic rubber. Results indicate that even in the earth's most remote regions, humans are leaving a plastic legacy in the snow, illustrating the importance of remote, cryospheric regions as critical study sites for determining temporal fluxes in microplastic pollution.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 966
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), British Antarctic Survey (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Sight Research UK, European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Institut chilien de l'Antarctique, Natural Environment Research Council, British Antarctic Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
18.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.