Comparative Evaluation of the Precision and Accuracy of Five Available Glucometers in India

Abstract Background: The monitoring of glucose plays an inevitable role in diabetes management. Over the years, technological leaps in diabetes management have contributed immensely to improving the quality of life of people with diabetes. Along with the multitude of benefits, these technologies provide, particularly glucose meters, the chances of compromises in the accuracy and precision of these devices also exist due to high competition among the manufacturers. Hence, it is essential, that both people with diabetes and healthcare professionals be aware of the accuracy and precision of glucose meters and whether they meet the accuracy standards recommended by international organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization and the Food and Drug Administration to avoid severe consequences. Aim: The study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy, performance, and precision of five glucosemeters On Call Plus, Cool, One Touch, Contour Plus, and Accu-chek Instant in people without diabetes, with type1 diabetes, and with type 2 diabetes. Result: The results revealed that all the glucose meters chosen for the study showed reasonably satisfactory clinical accuracy and precision in people without and with type 2 diabetes. However, in the cohort with type 1 diabetes, the performance of the meters was only moderately satisfactory. Conclusion: The study brings into the limelight the importance of evaluating the accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring devices, irrespective of blindly believing the technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdt.ijdt_44_24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Precision and Accuracy of Five Available Glucometers in India

Anjana Basanth, Gopika Beena Chandran, R. Sreelakshmi, Arun Shankar et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Diabetes and Technology
Agricultural Economics and Practices
1.34
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Precision and Accuracy of Five Available Glucometers in India

Anjana Basanth, Gopika Beena Chandran, R. Sreelakshmi, Arun Shankar, Jothydev Kesavadev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: The monitoring of glucose plays an inevitable role in diabetes management. Over the years, technological leaps in diabetes management have contributed immensely to improving the quality of life of people with diabetes. Along with the multitude of benefits, these technologies provide, particularly glucose meters, the chances of compromises in the accuracy and precision of these devices also exist due to high competition among the manufacturers. Hence, it is essential, that both people with diabetes and healthcare professionals be aware of the accuracy and precision of glucose meters and whether they meet the accuracy standards recommended by international organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization and the Food and Drug Administration to avoid severe consequences. Aim: The study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy, performance, and precision of five glucosemeters On Call Plus, Cool, One Touch, Contour Plus, and Accu-chek Instant in people without diabetes, with type1 diabetes, and with type 2 diabetes. Result: The results revealed that all the glucose meters chosen for the study showed reasonably satisfactory clinical accuracy and precision in people without and with type 2 diabetes. However, in the cohort with type 1 diabetes, the performance of the meters was only moderately satisfactory. Conclusion: The study brings into the limelight the importance of evaluating the accuracy and precision of glucose monitoring devices, irrespective of blindly believing the technology.

International Journal of Diabetes and TechnologyVol. 3(4)
Jothydev's Diabetes and Research Center (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.