Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates

The authors study how complementarities in skill may affect the returns to vocational training using a randomized controlled trial in Cairo, Egypt. Participants, who were college-educated, were given either a four-week training in soft skills (e.g., grooming, time management), technical skills (e.g., Microsoft programs, English language), or a mix of the two (half of each). Findings show large differences in outcomes between the three treatments. The technical and mixed treatments do best in the short term, raising first-job income by about 15%, relative to the soft skill treatment. In the longer term, the mixed-skill treatment significantly outperforms the other two treatments, giving participants 20–27% higher income. The high returns for this group may come from increased access to jobs that require speaking English, which may be at higher-quality employers. Overall, the results suggest that curriculum details play an important role in the outcomes of vocational training programs and that leveraging skill complementarity can yield tangible benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251316849
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates

Jamin D. Speer, Adam Osman
2 citations
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
3.13
article

Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates

Jamin D. Speer, Adam Osman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The authors study how complementarities in skill may affect the returns to vocational training using a randomized controlled trial in Cairo, Egypt. Participants, who were college-educated, were given either a four-week training in soft skills (e.g., grooming, time management), technical skills (e.g., Microsoft programs, English language), or a mix of the two (half of each). Findings show large differences in outcomes between the three treatments. The technical and mixed treatments do best in the short term, raising first-job income by about 15%, relative to the soft skill treatment. In the longer term, the mixed-skill treatment significantly outperforms the other two treatments, giving participants 20–27% higher income. The high returns for this group may come from increased access to jobs that require speaking English, which may be at higher-quality employers. Overall, the results suggest that curriculum details play an important role in the outcomes of vocational training programs and that leveraging skill complementarity can yield tangible benefits.

Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewVol. 78(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Memphis (US)
International Development Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are Soft Skills Enough? Experimental Evidence on Skill Complementarity for College Graduates — Jamin D. Speer, Adam Osman · Industrial and Labor Relations Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS