Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma
MRF-web produces outcomes comparable to HFA SITA-Faster. Its portability and cost-effectiveness suggest suitability as an alternative method for visual field testing where a standard perimeter is not easily accessible.
Authors
- Algis J. Vingrys (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-4604)
- Ashish Agar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9346-1938)
- Allan Bank
- Selwyn Marc Prea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-4470)
- Sarah Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-5590)
- Adam A. Moktar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6340-7544)
- Yu Xiang George Kong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4441-0648)
- Joyce Tiang
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Australian College of Optometry (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
- Dubbo Hospital (AU)
- Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU)
- Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Ophthalmology
- Published
- 2025-02-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2025.1485950
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.83
Funders
- auDA Foundation