Assessing diagnostic performance for common skin diseases using an AI-assisted tele-expertise platform: a proof of concept

Advancements in machine learning (ML) are making artificial intelligence more feasible in dermatology, with promising results for diagnosing skin cancers, though few studies cover common or inflammatory dermatoses. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for common non-cancerous skin diseases and the clinical applicability of an ML model in practical telemedicine. A prospective, multi-centre, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with common dermatoses, between October 2022 and July 2023, was performed. The top three diagnoses (Top 1, Top 2 and Top 3) from the AI system, trained to recognize 25 common dermatoses based on skin lesion images and medical data, were compared to diagnoses by two dermatologists (gold standard) to calculate the AI model's diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Two versions of the AI software were evaluated: version 1 (V1) and version 2 (V2) with and without medical supervision (MS), referring to the use of metadata to control diagnostic predictions. Seventy participants and 195 photographs were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the Top 3 algorithm were 88% and 90%, respectively, for V2, with a significant improvement compared with V1. For V1, diagnostic accuracy was 0.57 (0.46;0.69) for Top 1, 0.70 (0.59;0.81) for Top 2, and 0.81 (0.72;0.91) for Top 3. For V2, diagnostic accuracy was 0.69 (0.58;0.79) and 0.71 (0.61;0.82) without and with MS, respectively, for Top 1; 0.87 (0.79;0.95) for Top 2; and 0.90 (0.83;0.97) for Top 3. Our AI model appears to be a promising tool for triaging and diagnosing skin lesions, especially for non-specialist physicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dermatology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2024.4804
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing diagnostic performance for common skin diseases using an AI-assisted tele-expertise platform: a proof of concept

Marie Jouandet, J.-M. L’Orphelin, P. Carvalho-Lallement, R. Patrick Abergel et al.
European Journal of Dermatology
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Assessing diagnostic performance for common skin diseases using an AI-assisted tele-expertise platform: a proof of concept

Marie Jouandet, J.-M. L’Orphelin, P. Carvalho-Lallement, R. Patrick Abergel, Roger Huybrechts, A. Dompmartin, Florine Le Lay, Damiano Cerasuolo, Ouriel Barzilay
article en

Abstract

Advancements in machine learning (ML) are making artificial intelligence more feasible in dermatology, with promising results for diagnosing skin cancers, though few studies cover common or inflammatory dermatoses. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for common non-cancerous skin diseases and the clinical applicability of an ML model in practical telemedicine. A prospective, multi-centre, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with common dermatoses, between October 2022 and July 2023, was performed. The top three diagnoses (Top 1, Top 2 and Top 3) from the AI system, trained to recognize 25 common dermatoses based on skin lesion images and medical data, were compared to diagnoses by two dermatologists (gold standard) to calculate the AI model's diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Two versions of the AI software were evaluated: version 1 (V1) and version 2 (V2) with and without medical supervision (MS), referring to the use of metadata to control diagnostic predictions. Seventy participants and 195 photographs were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the Top 3 algorithm were 88% and 90%, respectively, for V2, with a significant improvement compared with V1. For V1, diagnostic accuracy was 0.57 (0.46;0.69) for Top 1, 0.70 (0.59;0.81) for Top 2, and 0.81 (0.72;0.91) for Top 3. For V2, diagnostic accuracy was 0.69 (0.58;0.79) and 0.71 (0.61;0.82) without and with MS, respectively, for Top 1; 0.87 (0.79;0.95) for Top 2; and 0.90 (0.83;0.97) for Top 3. Our AI model appears to be a promising tool for triaging and diagnosing skin lesions, especially for non-specialist physicians.

European Journal of DermatologyVol. 34(6)
Inserm (FR), Kaplan Medical Center (IL), Cancers et Préventions (FR), Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin (FR), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.