Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Toxin-Producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans in Belgium

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite a significant reduction in diphtheria incidence and mortality due to vaccination, antitoxin therapy and antibiotic treatments, a concerning resurgence is occurring in Europe. Resistance to penicillins and macrolides is emerging, resulting in a growing challenge for diphtheria management. This retrospective study aims to evaluate and compare antibiotic susceptibilities of both toxigenic <i>Corynebacterium diphtheriae</i> and <i>C. ulcerans</i>. <b>Methods</b>: Susceptibilities were assessed using broth microdilution-the gold standard-disk diffusion and the gradient method, and analyzed on the basis of the EUCAST breakpoint tables for the interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Antimicrobial resistance genes and mutations were detected by analyzing whole-genome sequences (WGS). <b>Results</b>: A small number of <i>C. diphtheriae</i> isolates were resistant to the first-choice antimicrobial classes, penicillins and macrolides, while higher resistance rates were observed for ciprofloxacin (29%), tetracycline (38%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 85%). A good correlation was found with resistance genes and mutations detected by WGS. <i>C. ulcerans</i> isolates were susceptible to all tested antibiotics, except clindamycin, to which this species is naturally resistant, and a few ciprofloxacin resistances not confirmed by WGS. Diffusion techniques were found to be acceptable alternatives, but false susceptible results were detected for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline by disk diffusion and ciprofloxacin and SXT by gradient diffusion. <b>Conclusions</b>: Penicillins and macrolides remain the first-choice antibiotics for the treatment of diphtheria. However, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is needed for all toxigenic <i>C. diphtheriae</i> and <i>C. ulcerans</i> isolates, as resistance is emerging. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should not be limited to penicillins and macrolides, but be extended to other antibiotics. When WGS is performed for epidemiological purposes, resistance genes and mutations should be looked for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14020160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Toxin-Producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans in Belgium

Robin Vanstokstraeten, Eveline Van Honacker, Denis Piérard, Kristof Vandoorslaer et al.
1 citations
Antibiotics
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
1.80
article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Toxin-Producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans in Belgium

Robin Vanstokstraeten, Eveline Van Honacker, Denis Piérard, Kristof Vandoorslaer, Helena Martini, Ingrid Wybo, Zan Janssen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite a significant reduction in diphtheria incidence and mortality due to vaccination, antitoxin therapy and antibiotic treatments, a concerning resurgence is occurring in Europe. Resistance to penicillins and macrolides is emerging, resulting in a growing challenge for diphtheria management. This retrospective study aims to evaluate and compare antibiotic susceptibilities of both toxigenic <i>Corynebacterium diphtheriae</i> and <i>C. ulcerans</i>. <b>Methods</b>: Susceptibilities were assessed using broth microdilution-the gold standard-disk diffusion and the gradient method, and analyzed on the basis of the EUCAST breakpoint tables for the interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Antimicrobial resistance genes and mutations were detected by analyzing whole-genome sequences (WGS). <b>Results</b>: A small number of <i>C. diphtheriae</i> isolates were resistant to the first-choice antimicrobial classes, penicillins and macrolides, while higher resistance rates were observed for ciprofloxacin (29%), tetracycline (38%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 85%). A good correlation was found with resistance genes and mutations detected by WGS. <i>C. ulcerans</i> isolates were susceptible to all tested antibiotics, except clindamycin, to which this species is naturally resistant, and a few ciprofloxacin resistances not confirmed by WGS. Diffusion techniques were found to be acceptable alternatives, but false susceptible results were detected for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline by disk diffusion and ciprofloxacin and SXT by gradient diffusion. <b>Conclusions</b>: Penicillins and macrolides remain the first-choice antibiotics for the treatment of diphtheria. However, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is needed for all toxigenic <i>C. diphtheriae</i> and <i>C. ulcerans</i> isolates, as resistance is emerging. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should not be limited to penicillins and macrolides, but be extended to other antibiotics. When WGS is performed for epidemiological purposes, resistance genes and mutations should be looked for.

AntibioticsVol. 14(2)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
1.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.