Sensory or Intelligence Data Compression Can Drive the Yerkes–Dodson Effect

New probability models of inherently embodied cognition derived from the asymptotic limit theorems of information and control theories show, where the Weber–Fechner, Stevens, Hick–Hyman, and Pieron’s psychophysics laws—and analogous processes of sensory data rate compression—operate, that sufficient arousal will engender the classic Yerkes–Dodson effect responses for ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ challenges, depending on the level of ‘noise’ impeding the cognition rate. A ‘hallucination’ mode is found to arise at low arousal, and, in the face of sufficient noise, a ‘panic’ mode at high arousal. Systems that are ‘ductile’ in a formal sense, however, are not afflicted by such hallucination, although panic remains for difficult challenges. Similar dynamics that surround organized conflict on ‘Clausewitz landscapes’ of fog, friction, and deadly adversarial intent have long been studied. We find a central mechanism for cognitive failure under increasing stress across a very broad range of modalities to be enough—usually badly needed—compression of sensory/intelligence and internal information transmission rates. It seems possible, with some effort, to convert the probability models developed here into robust statistical tools for the study and limited control of critical real-time, real-world embodied cognitive phenomena associated with cellular, neural, individual, machine, and institutional systems and their many composites.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensory or Intelligence Data Compression Can Drive the Yerkes–Dodson Effect

Rodrick Wallace
1 citations
Symmetry
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
article

Sensory or Intelligence Data Compression Can Drive the Yerkes–Dodson Effect

Rodrick Wallace
article en
1 citations

Abstract

New probability models of inherently embodied cognition derived from the asymptotic limit theorems of information and control theories show, where the Weber–Fechner, Stevens, Hick–Hyman, and Pieron’s psychophysics laws—and analogous processes of sensory data rate compression—operate, that sufficient arousal will engender the classic Yerkes–Dodson effect responses for ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ challenges, depending on the level of ‘noise’ impeding the cognition rate. A ‘hallucination’ mode is found to arise at low arousal, and, in the face of sufficient noise, a ‘panic’ mode at high arousal. Systems that are ‘ductile’ in a formal sense, however, are not afflicted by such hallucination, although panic remains for difficult challenges. Similar dynamics that surround organized conflict on ‘Clausewitz landscapes’ of fog, friction, and deadly adversarial intent have long been studied. We find a central mechanism for cognitive failure under increasing stress across a very broad range of modalities to be enough—usually badly needed—compression of sensory/intelligence and internal information transmission rates. It seems possible, with some effort, to convert the probability models developed here into robust statistical tools for the study and limited control of critical real-time, real-world embodied cognitive phenomena associated with cellular, neural, individual, machine, and institutional systems and their many composites.

SymmetryVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.